Axis leaderboard / API and MCP / weight 9 of 100

Best AI app builders for API and MCP work

REST surface, webhook delivery, background jobs and Model Context Protocol support. The quality of the machine facing surface: REST design, authentication, rate limiting, webhook signing and Model Context Protocol support.

Ranked by api and mcp

Ordered by axis subscore, highest first.

Best AI app builders for API and MCP work
#ToolAPI and MCPREST APIWebhooksMCP serverComposite
97.0
Versioned REST with API keysOutbound with HMAC signing and delivery historyYes, verified by connecting a client87.96
82.0
HTTP actions with key handlingOutbound with retriesYes70.50
79.0
Generated per function, no key manager by defaultOutbound supported, signing written by handYes78.06
78.0
Versioned when asked, documented as it goesSigned with a retry ladder by defaultYes, client and server80.30
76.0
Versioned and documentedSigned with a delivery logYes71.52
74.0
Written to your conventionsWritten properly when the criterion names signingYes, client and server78.65
74.0
Written to your existing conventionsSigned with a delivery logYes75.92
72.0
Written from the spec it producedSigned, delivery log when askedYes76.31
72.0
Written to your conventionsSigned when the criterion names itYes74.04
72.0
Written and documentedSigned with a delivery logYes66.36
71.0
Hand written, full controlHand written, full controlYes73.42
70.0
Written to your conventionsSigned when the criterion names itYes71.91
70.0
Written to your conventionsSigned when the criterion names itYes71.51
68.0
Written with contract testsWritten with tests around the signatureYes67.13
68.0
Written to your conventionsWritten, signing on requestYes65.18
66.0
Generated per project, versioning is manualOutbound supported, signing needs promptingYes, official connector77.87
17Zed logoZed
66.0
Written to your conventionsWritten, signing on requestYes72.17
66.0
Generated per entityInbound and outbound, no signing by defaultNo first party server70.54
66.0
Written to your conventionsWritten, signing on requestPartial68.69
64.0
Written to your conventionsWritten, signing on requestYes66.89
62.0
Written to your conventionsHand guidedPartial67.27
62.0
Generated with API keysOutbound, unsigned by defaultYes63.18
62.0
Written to your conventionsWritten, signing on requestYes61.04
61.0
Generated, conventions vary between runsGenerated on requestYes66.79
25v0 logov0
60.0
Route handlers, no key management by defaultHand written, no built in delivery logYes74.69
60.0
Hand writtenHand writtenYes64.77
60.0
Written to your conventionsWritten, unsigned by defaultYes62.25
58.0
Hand writtenHand writtenNo first party server71.94
58.0
Route handlers, keys added on requestOutbound, unsigned by defaultNo67.30
57.0
Generated, unversionedOutbound, signing on requestYes67.16
55.0
Read and write, no key rotationOutbound only, no retry ladderNo66.17
54.0
Written to your conventionsWritten, unsigned by defaultPartial56.79
52.0
Generated, no key managementOutbound only, unsignedNo60.16
52.0
Gateway exposedOutbound is constrained by the runtimeNo60.10
50.0
Route handlersHand writtenPartial59.33
48.0
Hand writtenHand writtenCommunity support58.17
48.0
Generated, minimal key handlingInbound onlyNo55.27
47.0
LimitedOutbound onlyNo58.78
44.0
Read mostlyInbound onlyNo56.55
44.0
Generated, limited controlsOutbound onlyNo55.67
41.0
Read mostlyInbound onlyNo55.45

How the api and mcp axis is measured

Scored against the prompt 4 and prompt 5 pass criteria with a fixed 22 point checklist covering versioning, error envelopes, idempotency keys, key revocation, HMAC signing, retry ladders and delivery history. MCP support is verified by connecting a client and listing tools.

This axis carries 9 of the 100 index points. Each product completed 5 runs of 9 prompts in this cycle, and the underlying per run data behind every figure on this page is downloadable at /api/runs.json under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

A high score on one axis is not a recommendation. Read it against the composite column on the right and against the axes that matter for the work you have in front of you. Reliability at 93.3% for the leader of this cohort is the context for everything else on the page.

Other axis leaderboards