Floot logo

fullstack-builder / rank 26 of 41 / cycle 04

Floot benchmark

Visual output is a clear tier above its index neighbours and the data model it produced for prompt 2 needed no correction. It has almost nothing for the operator: no delivery history for webhooks, no rate limiting on the generated endpoints and no durable queue, so prompts 4 to 6 are where the score is lost rather than earned.

Last run: 14 Aug 2026 17:40 UTCNext scheduled run: 21 Aug 2026 09:00 UTCOfficial siteFloot reviews and ratings

Composite index

66.17

of 100 | 1 versus cycle 03

At a glance

Composite index

66.17

rank 26 of 41

Rank

#26

of 41 measured builders

Median speed

91.1 s

p10 46.1 s, p90 174.2 s

Reliability

68.9%

strict pass rate

SEO score

70.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

  • Design output84.0
  • Agent performance72.0
  • Value72.0

Three weakest axes

  • Speed34.5
  • API and MCP55.0
  • Code ownership62.0

Median per prompt

91.1 s

p10 46.1 s, p90 174.2 s

Strict pass rate

68.9%

31 pass, 8 partial, 6 fail

Executions recorded

45

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

EUR 20.00

Cheapest plan that can finish the specification

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 66.17. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
AxisSubscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster medianScoreMedianWeight %Contribution
Agent performance72.075.01812.96
Reliability68.971.11812.40
Scalability66.070.0138.58
SEO and GEO70.058.0128.40
API and MCP55.062.094.95
Integrations64.066.085.12
Design output84.071.075.88
Speed34.533.072.42
Value72.076.053.60
Code ownership62.090.031.86

Speed distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Floot, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 30.0 smax 352.0 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 46.1 s / median 91.1 s / p90 174.2 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.91x.

Outcome split

31 pass / 8 partial / 6 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

HTML bytes, no JS

19.0 KB

19,456 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

2,020 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.050

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

70.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

Raw per run measurements
RunPromptPrompt targetStartedDuration (s)OutcomeNote
R01P01Tenant and user model11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC44.6pass
R01P02Authentication and session11 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC71.1pass
R01P03Projects CRUD with tenancy11 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC173.7partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R01P04Public REST API with keys11 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC193.7pass
R01P05Outbound webhooks with signatures11 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC90.7partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R01P06Background jobs11 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC91.1failNo durable background work available. The scheduled task was scaffolded and never executed.
R01P07Admin panel11 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC106.1pass
R01P08Public marketing surface11 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC45.5failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R01P09Hardening pass11 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC80.3pass
R02P01Tenant and user model12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC85.0failBuild did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved.
R02P02Authentication and session12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC171.2partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R02P03Projects CRUD with tenancy12 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC32.8pass
R02P04Public REST API with keys12 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC122.1pass
R02P05Outbound webhooks with signatures12 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC174.5pass
R02P06Background jobs12 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC99.0pass
R02P07Admin panel12 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC127.1pass
R02P08Public marketing surface12 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC153.8partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R02P09Hardening pass12 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC209.3partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R03P01Tenant and user model13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC64.4pass
R03P02Authentication and session13 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC148.4pass
R03P03Projects CRUD with tenancy13 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC67.7pass
R03P04Public REST API with keys13 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC117.7pass
R03P05Outbound webhooks with signatures13 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC241.7pass
R03P06Background jobs13 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC103.7failNo durable background work available. The scheduled task was scaffolded and never executed.
R03P07Admin panel13 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC105.6pass
R03P08Public marketing surface13 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC85.7partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R03P09Hardening pass13 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC86.6pass
R04P01Tenant and user model14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC85.2partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R04P02Authentication and session14 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC108.5pass
R04P03Projects CRUD with tenancy14 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC54.4pass
R04P04Public REST API with keys14 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC64.1pass
R04P05Outbound webhooks with signatures14 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC352.0partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R04P06Background jobs14 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC127.8pass
R04P07Admin panel14 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC139.5pass
R04P08Public marketing surface14 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC45.1pass
R04P09Hardening pass14 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC65.4pass
R05P01Tenant and user model15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC70.1failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R05P02Authentication and session15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC81.5pass
R05P03Projects CRUD with tenancy15 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC47.0pass
R05P04Public REST API with keys15 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC30.0pass
R05P05Outbound webhooks with signatures15 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC142.4pass
R05P06Background jobs15 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC122.2failNo durable background work available. The scheduled task was scaffolded and never executed.
R05P07Admin panel15 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC73.7pass
R05P08Public marketing surface15 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC72.5pass
R05P09Hardening pass15 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC128.4pass

Pricing

Free tier with a daily allowance. Paid plans from EUR 20 per month.

Entry price
EUR 20.00
Value subscore
72.0
Index points per euro
3.31

Capabilities as measured

stack
React with a hosted data layer
deploy
Hosted deploy
database
Built in tables with relations
auth
Built in
background jobs
No
webhooks
Outbound only, no retry ladder
rest api
Read and write, no key rotation
mcp server
No
export code
Limited
custom domain
Yes on paid plans
ssr
Partial

Screenshot

Floot landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Floot landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Floot, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
SourceURLFetched
Floot pricing pagehttps://floot.com/pricing14 Aug 2026
Floot product sitehttps://floot.com14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness outputhttps://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.3 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Floot head to head

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Reader index

not rated yet

Lab index

66.17

1 readers have scored 88% of the index weight so far. A reader index is published at 3 voters and 50% coverage.

Reader mean against the measured lab subscore for each axis
AxisWeightLabReadersVotesReader mean
Agent performance18%72.085.01
Reliability18%68.982.01
Scalability13%66.082.01
SEO and GEO12%70.082.01
Integrations8%64.076.01
Design output7%84.097.01
Speed7%34.544.01
Value5%72.074.01

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

n/a

0 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

66.17

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

n/a

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

Visual output is a clear tier above its index neighbours and the data model it produced for prompt 2 needed no correction. It has almost nothing for the operator: no delivery history for webhooks, no rate limiting on the generated endpoints and no durable queue, so prompts 4 to 6 are where the score is lost rather than earned.

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 31 times, partially 8 times and failed 6 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.