coding-agent / rank 37 of 41 / cycle 04
Pazi benchmark
The newest entry in the agent group and the least settled. Two of the five runs cleared most of the spec and the other three stalled on the operational prompts, which is the pattern of a product still finding its loop rather than a broken one. Worth re watching next cycle: the ceiling looked considerably higher than the median.
Composite index
56.79
of 100 | ▲ 1 versus cycle 03
At a glance
Composite index
56.79
rank 37 of 41
Rank
#37
of 41 measured builders
Median speed
120.9 s
p10 69.6 s, p90 243.9 s
Reliability
53.3%
strict pass rate
SEO score
50.0
0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis
Three strongest axes
- Code ownership90.0
- Value78.0
- Agent performance65.0
Three weakest axes
- Speed26.0
- SEO and GEO50.0
- Reliability53.3
Median per prompt
120.9 s
p10 69.6 s, p90 243.9 s
Strict pass rate
53.3%
24 pass, 7 partial, 14 fail
Executions recorded
45
5 runs of 9 prompts
Entry price
EUR 14.00
Cheapest plan that can finish the specification
Per axis subscores
Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 56.79. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.
| Axis | Subscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster median | Score | Median | Weight % | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 65.0 | 75.0 | 18 | 11.70 | |
| Reliability | 53.3 | 71.1 | 18 | 9.59 | |
| Scalability | 58.0 | 70.0 | 13 | 7.54 | |
| SEO and GEO | 50.0 | 58.0 | 12 | 6.00 | |
| API and MCP | 54.0 | 62.0 | 9 | 4.86 | |
| Integrations | 56.0 | 66.0 | 8 | 4.48 | |
| Design output | 60.0 | 71.0 | 7 | 4.20 | |
| Speed | 26.0 | 33.0 | 7 | 1.82 | |
| Value | 78.0 | 76.0 | 5 | 3.90 | |
| Code ownership | 90.0 | 90.0 | 3 | 2.70 |
Speed distribution
Every recorded prompt duration for Pazi, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.
Spread against the cohort
p10 69.6 s / median 120.9 s / p90 243.9 s
Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 2.02x.
Outcome split
24 pass / 7 partial / 14 fail
SEO and GEO measurements
Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.
HTML bytes, no JS
15.0 KB
15,360 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked
LCP
2,140 ms
Throttled connection, cold cache
CLS
0.060
Cumulative layout shift on load
SEO and GEO subscore
50.0
0 to 100, worth 12 index points
Raw run data: 45 executions
One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.
| Run | Prompt | Prompt target | Started | Duration (s) | Outcome | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R01 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 61.6 | fail | Deployed URL returned 500 on every request. |
| R01 | P02 | Authentication and session | 11 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 75.1 | partial | Required one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met. |
| R01 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 11 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 103.8 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R01 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 11 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC | 146.1 | partial | Required one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met. |
| R01 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 11 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC | 306.6 | fail | Agent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes. |
| R01 | P06 | Background jobs | 11 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC | 95.9 | pass | |
| R01 | P07 | Admin panel | 11 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 231.0 | pass | |
| R01 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 11 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC | 264.4 | pass | |
| R01 | P09 | Hardening pass | 11 Aug 2026 08:37 UTC | 83.0 | fail | Build did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved. |
| R02 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 91.5 | pass | |
| R02 | P02 | Authentication and session | 12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 158.5 | pass | |
| R02 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 12 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC | 77.8 | pass | |
| R02 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 12 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC | 220.3 | pass | |
| R02 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 12 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC | 212.5 | fail | Agent stalled on the operational prompt and produced no artifact within the 20 minute window. |
| R02 | P06 | Background jobs | 12 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC | 244.8 | fail | Run did not recover after the previous prompt stalled. No queue, no worker, no artifact. |
| R02 | P07 | Admin panel | 12 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC | 125.8 | pass | |
| R02 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 12 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC | 143.1 | pass | |
| R02 | P09 | Hardening pass | 12 Aug 2026 08:37 UTC | 157.3 | fail | Agent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes. |
| R03 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 62.4 | pass | |
| R03 | P02 | Authentication and session | 13 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 83.4 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R03 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 13 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 116.4 | pass | |
| R03 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 13 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC | 78.3 | fail | Task abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced. |
| R03 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 13 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC | 219.6 | fail | Agent stalled on the operational prompt and produced no artifact within the 20 minute window. |
| R03 | P06 | Background jobs | 13 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC | 93.1 | fail | Run did not recover after the previous prompt stalled. No queue, no worker, no artifact. |
| R03 | P07 | Admin panel | 13 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC | 123.0 | pass | |
| R03 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 13 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC | 70.2 | fail | Task abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced. |
| R03 | P09 | Hardening pass | 13 Aug 2026 08:30 UTC | 56.5 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R04 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 120.9 | pass | |
| R04 | P02 | Authentication and session | 14 Aug 2026 08:04 UTC | 86.7 | partial | Delivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria. |
| R04 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 14 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC | 69.2 | pass | |
| R04 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 14 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC | 242.6 | partial | Validation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded. |
| R04 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 14 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC | 129.3 | pass | |
| R04 | P06 | Background jobs | 14 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC | 184.2 | partial | Delivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria. |
| R04 | P07 | Admin panel | 14 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 101.9 | pass | |
| R04 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 14 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC | 105.5 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R04 | P09 | Hardening pass | 14 Aug 2026 08:33 UTC | 112.0 | pass | |
| R05 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 50.0 | pass | |
| R05 | P02 | Authentication and session | 15 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC | 157.7 | pass | |
| R05 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 15 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC | 255.8 | pass | |
| R05 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 15 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC | 373.8 | pass | |
| R05 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 15 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC | 136.7 | fail | Agent stalled on the operational prompt and produced no artifact within the 20 minute window. |
| R05 | P06 | Background jobs | 15 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC | 213.4 | fail | Run did not recover after the previous prompt stalled. No queue, no worker, no artifact. |
| R05 | P07 | Admin panel | 15 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC | 94.9 | pass | |
| R05 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 15 Aug 2026 08:35 UTC | 175.5 | pass | |
| R05 | P09 | Hardening pass | 15 Aug 2026 08:40 UTC | 85.6 | pass |
Pricing
Free tier with a small task allowance. Paid plans from EUR 14 per month.
- Entry price
- EUR 14.00
- Value subscore
- 78.0
- Index points per euro
- 4.06
Capabilities as measured
- stack
- Your repository, any framework
- deploy
- Not included
- database
- Whatever you already run
- auth
- It wires the library you choose
- background jobs
- Partial
- webhooks
- Written, unsigned by default
- rest api
- Written to your conventions
- mcp server
- Partial
- export code
- The code was never anywhere else
- custom domain
- Your hosting decides
- ssr
- Your framework decides
Screenshot
Pazi landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Pazi, captured 14 Aug 2026.
Sources and fetch dates
Every claim on this page traces to one of these.
| Source | URL | Fetched |
|---|---|---|
| Pazi pricing page | https://pazi.ai/pricing | 14 Aug 2026 |
| Pazi product site | https://pazi.ai | 14 Aug 2026 |
| LLM Tier run harness output | https://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json | 14 Aug 2026 |
Rich results carry this composite as 2.8 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.
Reader index
Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.
Reader index
not rated yet
Lab index
56.79
No reader has scored Pazi yet. The first 3 voters put the column on the board.
The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.
Open rating mean
n/a
0 published open ratings, submitted without an account
Lab index
56.79
Measured, not voted
Gap to the measurement
n/a
Positive means open raters put it above the measurement
What agent performance looked like in practice
The newest entry in the agent group and the least settled. Two of the five runs cleared most of the spec and the other three stalled on the operational prompts, which is the pattern of a product still finding its loop rather than a broken one. Worth re watching next cycle: the ceiling looked considerably higher than the median.
Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 24 times, partially 7 times and failed 14 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.