Trickle logo

fullstack-builder / rank 40 of 41 / cycle 04

Trickle benchmark

The best public page output in the lower half, with real server rendered text and clean metadata, which lifts its SEO subscore well above its neighbours. Everything behind the marketing surface is thin: no key management, no signed webhooks and no durable background work.

Last run: 14 Aug 2026 17:40 UTCNext scheduled run: 21 Aug 2026 09:00 UTCOfficial siteTrickle reviews and ratings

Composite index

55.45

of 100 | 1 versus cycle 03

At a glance

Composite index

55.45

rank 40 of 41

Rank

#40

of 41 measured builders

Median speed

87.0 s

p10 49.4 s, p90 137.1 s

Reliability

51.1%

strict pass rate

SEO score

63.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

  • Design output79.0
  • Value75.0
  • SEO and GEO63.0

Three weakest axes

  • Speed36.1
  • API and MCP41.0
  • Code ownership45.0

Median per prompt

87.0 s

p10 49.4 s, p90 137.1 s

Strict pass rate

51.1%

23 pass, 11 partial, 11 fail

Executions recorded

45

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

EUR 15.00

Cheapest plan that can finish the specification

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 55.45. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
AxisSubscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster medianScoreMedianWeight %Contribution
Agent performance62.075.01811.16
Reliability51.171.1189.20
Scalability52.070.0136.76
SEO and GEO63.058.0127.56
API and MCP41.062.093.69
Integrations49.066.083.92
Design output79.071.075.53
Speed36.133.072.53
Value75.076.053.75
Code ownership45.090.031.35

Speed distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Trickle, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 32.6 smax 204.4 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 49.4 s / median 87.0 s / p90 137.1 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.58x.

Outcome split

23 pass / 11 partial / 11 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

HTML bytes, no JS

15.0 KB

15,360 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

2,260 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.070

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

63.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

Raw per run measurements
RunPromptPrompt targetStartedDuration (s)OutcomeNote
R01P01Tenant and user model11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC78.6pass
R01P02Authentication and session11 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC131.4partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R01P03Projects CRUD with tenancy11 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC107.1pass
R01P04Public REST API with keys11 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC109.2failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R01P05Outbound webhooks with signatures11 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC96.4pass
R01P06Background jobs11 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC60.8failBackground jobs are out of scope for the platform. Nothing queued, nothing scheduled.
R01P07Admin panel11 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC90.4pass
R01P08Public marketing surface11 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC39.0pass
R01P09Hardening pass11 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC114.6failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R02P01Tenant and user model12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC87.0pass
R02P02Authentication and session12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC85.8pass
R02P03Projects CRUD with tenancy12 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC46.4pass
R02P04Public REST API with keys12 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC133.3partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R02P05Outbound webhooks with signatures12 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC106.7partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R02P06Background jobs12 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC79.2failBackground jobs are out of scope for the platform. Nothing queued, nothing scheduled.
R02P07Admin panel12 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC85.1pass
R02P08Public marketing surface12 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC34.0pass
R02P09Hardening pass12 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC73.1failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R03P01Tenant and user model13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC87.1partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R03P02Authentication and session13 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC77.7pass
R03P03Projects CRUD with tenancy13 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC79.3partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R03P04Public REST API with keys13 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC61.7partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R03P05Outbound webhooks with signatures13 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC119.4failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R03P06Background jobs13 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC122.0failBackground jobs are out of scope for the platform. Nothing queued, nothing scheduled.
R03P07Admin panel13 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC90.1pass
R03P08Public marketing surface13 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC80.2pass
R03P09Hardening pass13 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC73.8failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R04P01Tenant and user model14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC32.6failAgent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes.
R04P02Authentication and session14 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC93.1pass
R04P03Projects CRUD with tenancy14 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC53.9pass
R04P04Public REST API with keys14 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC151.7pass
R04P05Outbound webhooks with signatures14 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC136.4pass
R04P06Background jobs14 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC74.3failBackground jobs are out of scope for the platform. Nothing queued, nothing scheduled.
R04P07Admin panel14 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC106.8pass
R04P08Public marketing surface14 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC69.1pass
R04P09Hardening pass14 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC137.5partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R05P01Tenant and user model15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC64.0partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R05P02Authentication and session15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC56.4pass
R05P03Projects CRUD with tenancy15 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC152.3partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R05P04Public REST API with keys15 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC38.0partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R05P05Outbound webhooks with signatures15 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC204.4pass
R05P06Background jobs15 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC117.0failBackground jobs are out of scope for the platform. Nothing queued, nothing scheduled.
R05P07Admin panel15 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC204.0pass
R05P08Public marketing surface15 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC81.0partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R05P09Hardening pass15 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC104.2pass

Pricing

Free tier for public pages. Paid plans from EUR 15 per month.

Entry price
EUR 15.00
Value subscore
75.0
Index points per euro
3.70

Capabilities as measured

stack
Site oriented platform with a light data layer
deploy
Hosted only
database
Built in collections
auth
Basic
background jobs
No
webhooks
Inbound only
rest api
Read mostly
mcp server
No
export code
No clean self host path
custom domain
Yes on paid plans
ssr
Server rendered public pages

Screenshot

Trickle landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Trickle landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Trickle, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
SourceURLFetched
Trickle pricing pagehttps://trickle.so/pricing14 Aug 2026
Trickle product sitehttps://trickle.so14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness outputhttps://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 2.8 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Trickle head to head

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Reader index

not rated yet

Lab index

55.45

2 readers have scored 100% of the index weight so far. A reader index is published at 3 voters and 50% coverage.

Reader mean against the measured lab subscore for each axis
AxisWeightLabReadersVotesReader mean
Agent performance18%62.057.02
Reliability18%51.141.02
Scalability13%52.048.02
SEO and GEO12%63.059.02
API and MCP9%41.037.01
Integrations8%49.046.02
Design output7%79.076.02
Speed7%36.131.02
Value5%75.076.52
Code ownership3%45.033.01

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

65.50

2 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

55.45

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

10.05

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

The best public page output in the lower half, with real server rendered text and clean metadata, which lifts its SEO subscore well above its neighbours. Everything behind the marketing surface is thin: no key management, no signed webhooks and no durable background work.

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 23 times, partially 11 times and failed 11 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.