Base44 logo

fullstack-builder / rank 16 of 41 / cycle 04

Base44 benchmark

Strong at the parts of the specification that map onto its built in primitives: entities, roles and the admin surface came out quickly and cleanly. The cost is portability. Exported code still depends on the platform runtime, so it scores lowest in the top half on code ownership.

Last run: 14 Aug 2026 17:40 UTCNext scheduled run: 21 Aug 2026 09:00 UTCOfficial siteBase44 reviews and ratings

Composite index

70.54

of 100 | 1 versus cycle 03

At a glance

Composite index

70.54

rank 16 of 41

Rank

#16

of 41 measured builders

Median speed

94.1 s

p10 58.8 s, p90 161.4 s

Reliability

84.4%

strict pass rate

SEO score

64.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

  • Reliability84.4
  • Design output80.0
  • Value76.0

Three weakest axes

  • Speed33.4
  • Code ownership55.0
  • SEO and GEO64.0

Median per prompt

94.1 s

p10 58.8 s, p90 161.4 s

Strict pass rate

84.4%

38 pass, 7 partial, 0 fail

Executions recorded

45

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

EUR 18.00

Cheapest plan that can finish the specification

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 70.54. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
AxisSubscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster medianScoreMedianWeight %Contribution
Agent performance75.075.01813.50
Reliability84.471.11815.19
Scalability68.070.0138.84
SEO and GEO64.058.0127.68
API and MCP66.062.095.94
Integrations75.066.086.00
Design output80.071.075.60
Speed33.433.072.34
Value76.076.053.80
Code ownership55.090.031.65

Speed distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Base44, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 49.2 smax 238.7 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 58.8 s / median 94.1 s / p90 161.4 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.72x.

Outcome split

38 pass / 7 partial / 0 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

HTML bytes, no JS

14.0 KB

14,336 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

2,320 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.080

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

64.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

Raw per run measurements
RunPromptPrompt targetStartedDuration (s)OutcomeNote
R01P01Tenant and user model11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC68.8pass
R01P02Authentication and session11 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC62.4pass
R01P03Projects CRUD with tenancy11 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC91.0pass
R01P04Public REST API with keys11 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC88.8pass
R01P05Outbound webhooks with signatures11 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC147.0pass
R01P06Background jobs11 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC104.7pass
R01P07Admin panel11 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC156.1partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R01P08Public marketing surface11 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC67.3pass
R01P09Hardening pass11 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC94.7partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R02P01Tenant and user model12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC103.5pass
R02P02Authentication and session12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC114.1pass
R02P03Projects CRUD with tenancy12 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC83.2partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R02P04Public REST API with keys12 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC116.0pass
R02P05Outbound webhooks with signatures12 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC203.7pass
R02P06Background jobs12 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC96.3pass
R02P07Admin panel12 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC58.6pass
R02P08Public marketing surface12 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC73.4pass
R02P09Hardening pass12 Aug 2026 08:30 UTC113.9pass
R03P01Tenant and user model13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC68.0pass
R03P02Authentication and session13 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC104.6pass
R03P03Projects CRUD with tenancy13 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC221.9pass
R03P04Public REST API with keys13 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC63.2partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R03P05Outbound webhooks with signatures13 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC59.6pass
R03P06Background jobs13 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC157.9pass
R03P07Admin panel13 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC79.4pass
R03P08Public marketing surface13 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC59.0pass
R03P09Hardening pass13 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC132.8pass
R04P01Tenant and user model14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC58.1pass
R04P02Authentication and session14 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC124.8pass
R04P03Projects CRUD with tenancy14 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC94.1partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R04P04Public REST API with keys14 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC162.2pass
R04P05Outbound webhooks with signatures14 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC161.4pass
R04P06Background jobs14 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC89.0pass
R04P07Admin panel14 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC161.3partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R04P08Public marketing surface14 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC92.3pass
R04P09Hardening pass14 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC52.6partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R05P01Tenant and user model15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC55.6pass
R05P02Authentication and session15 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC90.9pass
R05P03Projects CRUD with tenancy15 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC49.2pass
R05P04Public REST API with keys15 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC238.7pass
R05P05Outbound webhooks with signatures15 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC151.3pass
R05P06Background jobs15 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC117.6pass
R05P07Admin panel15 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC93.4pass
R05P08Public marketing surface15 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC65.9pass
R05P09Hardening pass15 Aug 2026 08:30 UTC95.7pass

Pricing

Free tier with a monthly message allowance. Paid plans from EUR 18 per month.

Entry price
EUR 18.00
Value subscore
76.0
Index points per euro
3.92

Capabilities as measured

stack
Platform runtime with a React front end
deploy
Hosted only
database
Built in entity store
auth
Built in users and roles
background jobs
Yes, platform scheduled functions
webhooks
Inbound and outbound, no signing by default
rest api
Generated per entity
mcp server
No first party server
export code
Partial, runtime dependency remains
custom domain
Yes on paid plans
ssr
Client rendered

Screenshot

Base44 landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Base44 landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Base44, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
SourceURLFetched
Base44 pricing pagehttps://base44.com/pricing14 Aug 2026
Base44 product sitehttps://base44.com14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness outputhttps://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.5 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Base44 head to head

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Reader index

72.48

Lab index

70.54

3 readers, 30 axis scores, last change 14 Aug 2026. Readers rate Base44 1.9 points above the measurement.

Reader mean against the measured lab subscore for each axis
AxisWeightLabReadersVotesReader mean
Agent performance18%75.078.33
Reliability18%84.485.03
Scalability13%68.069.73
SEO and GEO12%64.061.33
API and MCP9%66.070.73
Integrations8%75.079.33
Design output7%80.087.03
Speed7%33.432.73
Value5%76.076.73
Code ownership3%55.058.33

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

74.00

2 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

70.54

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

3.46

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

Strong at the parts of the specification that map onto its built in primitives: entities, roles and the admin surface came out quickly and cleanly. The cost is portability. Exported code still depends on the platform runtime, so it scores lowest in the top half on code ownership.

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 38 times, partially 7 times and failed 0 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.