Caffeine logo

fullstack-builder / rank 33 of 41 / cycle 04

Caffeine benchmark

The only product in the index that deploys to a decentralised runtime, which makes it the hardest to compare fairly. Data durability and tenancy were strong, and the application kept running with no server to maintain. Everything that assumes a conventional web stack, from the crawlable page test to the outbound webhook prompt, either scored low or did not apply, and the first paint numbers are the worst in the cohort.

Last run: 14 Aug 2026 17:40 UTCNext scheduled run: 21 Aug 2026 09:00 UTCOfficial siteCaffeine reviews and ratings

Composite index

60.10

of 100 | 1 versus cycle 03

At a glance

Composite index

60.10

rank 33 of 41

Rank

#33

of 41 measured builders

Median speed

150.6 s

p10 76.0 s, p90 295.5 s

Reliability

66.7%

strict pass rate

SEO score

48.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

  • Value76.0
  • Scalability74.0
  • Agent performance70.0

Three weakest axes

  • Speed20.8
  • Integrations46.0
  • SEO and GEO48.0

Median per prompt

150.6 s

p10 76.0 s, p90 295.5 s

Strict pass rate

66.7%

30 pass, 12 partial, 3 fail

Executions recorded

45

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

EUR 0.00

Cheapest plan that can finish the specification

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 60.10. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
AxisSubscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster medianScoreMedianWeight %Contribution
Agent performance70.075.01812.60
Reliability66.771.11812.01
Scalability74.070.0139.62
SEO and GEO48.058.0125.76
API and MCP52.062.094.68
Integrations46.066.083.68
Design output68.071.074.76
Speed20.833.071.46
Value76.076.053.80
Code ownership58.090.031.74

Speed distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Caffeine, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 53.3 smax 442.1 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 76.0 s / median 150.6 s / p90 295.5 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.96x.

Outcome split

30 pass / 12 partial / 3 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

HTML bytes, no JS

6.0 KB

6,144 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

2,840 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.110

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

48.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

Raw per run measurements
RunPromptPrompt targetStartedDuration (s)OutcomeNote
R01P01Tenant and user model11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC85.5pass
R01P02Authentication and session11 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC70.9pass
R01P03Projects CRUD with tenancy11 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC120.6pass
R01P04Public REST API with keys11 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC407.6partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R01P05Outbound webhooks with signatures11 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC186.3partialOutbound calls are constrained by the runtime. Delivery succeeded through a gateway, signing was added by hand.
R01P06Background jobs11 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC207.2pass
R01P07Admin panel11 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC114.7pass
R01P08Public marketing surface11 Aug 2026 08:33 UTC91.1pass
R01P09Hardening pass11 Aug 2026 08:37 UTC197.2pass
R02P01Tenant and user model12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC53.3pass
R02P02Authentication and session12 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC147.1partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R02P03Projects CRUD with tenancy12 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC149.7pass
R02P04Public REST API with keys12 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC265.9pass
R02P05Outbound webhooks with signatures12 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC228.2partialOutbound calls are constrained by the runtime. Delivery succeeded through a gateway, signing was added by hand.
R02P06Background jobs12 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC371.2pass
R02P07Admin panel12 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC162.5pass
R02P08Public marketing surface12 Aug 2026 08:36 UTC103.5partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R02P09Hardening pass12 Aug 2026 08:40 UTC129.1partialCrawlable page test scored low: the deployed front end renders entirely on the client.
R03P01Tenant and user model13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC93.7pass
R03P02Authentication and session13 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC131.6pass
R03P03Projects CRUD with tenancy13 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC185.2pass
R03P04Public REST API with keys13 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC442.1pass
R03P05Outbound webhooks with signatures13 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC74.9partialOutbound calls are constrained by the runtime. Delivery succeeded through a gateway, signing was added by hand.
R03P06Background jobs13 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC163.5partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R03P07Admin panel13 Aug 2026 08:30 UTC138.1pass
R03P08Public marketing surface13 Aug 2026 08:34 UTC77.6partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R03P09Hardening pass13 Aug 2026 08:37 UTC55.8pass
R04P01Tenant and user model14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC64.6pass
R04P02Authentication and session14 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC153.5failAgent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes.
R04P03Projects CRUD with tenancy14 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC135.8pass
R04P04Public REST API with keys14 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC150.6pass
R04P05Outbound webhooks with signatures14 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC154.8partialOutbound calls are constrained by the runtime. Delivery succeeded through a gateway, signing was added by hand.
R04P06Background jobs14 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC170.9failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R04P07Admin panel14 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC224.4pass
R04P08Public marketing surface14 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC204.8pass
R04P09Hardening pass14 Aug 2026 08:36 UTC78.7partialCrawlable page test scored low: the deployed front end renders entirely on the client.
R05P01Tenant and user model15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC106.0pass
R05P02Authentication and session15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC161.4pass
R05P03Projects CRUD with tenancy15 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC184.9pass
R05P04Public REST API with keys15 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC193.6pass
R05P05Outbound webhooks with signatures15 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC124.0partialOutbound calls are constrained by the runtime. Delivery succeeded through a gateway, signing was added by hand.
R05P06Background jobs15 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC378.7pass
R05P07Admin panel15 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC315.2pass
R05P08Public marketing surface15 Aug 2026 08:38 UTC191.8failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R05P09Hardening pass15 Aug 2026 08:43 UTC100.8pass

Pricing

No subscription. The deployed application pays for its own compute and storage from a prepaid balance.

Entry price
EUR 0.00
Value subscore
76.0
Index points per euro
60.10

Capabilities as measured

stack
Canister backend with a generated web front end
deploy
Deployed to a decentralised runtime
database
On chain persistent storage
auth
Cryptographic identity
background jobs
Timers, no external queue
webhooks
Outbound is constrained by the runtime
rest api
Gateway exposed
mcp server
No
export code
Yes, source is portable
custom domain
Yes
ssr
No

Screenshot

Caffeine landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Caffeine landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Caffeine, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
SourceURLFetched
Caffeine pricing pagehttps://caffeine.ai/pricing14 Aug 2026
Caffeine product sitehttps://caffeine.ai14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness outputhttps://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.0 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Reader index

not rated yet

Lab index

60.10

No reader has scored Caffeine yet. The first 3 voters put the column on the board.

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

n/a

0 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

60.10

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

n/a

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

The only product in the index that deploys to a decentralised runtime, which makes it the hardest to compare fairly. Data durability and tenancy were strong, and the application kept running with no server to maintain. Everything that assumes a conventional web stack, from the crawlable page test to the outbound webhook prompt, either scored low or did not apply, and the first paint numbers are the worst in the cohort.

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 30 times, partially 12 times and failed 3 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.