Replit logo

coding-agent / rank 10 of 41 / cycle 04

Replit benchmark

The most operationally complete result: a real queue, working scheduled jobs and a database that survived the 50000 row load without a rewrite. It is also the slowest of the top group because the agent runs a longer plan and test cycle. The public marketing surface was the weakest part, client rendered in 4 of 5 runs.

Last run: 14 Aug 2026 17:40 UTCNext scheduled run: 21 Aug 2026 09:00 UTCOfficial siteReplit reviews and ratings

Composite index

73.42

of 100 | 1 versus cycle 03

At a glance

Composite index

73.42

rank 10 of 41

Rank

#10

of 41 measured builders

Median speed

135.7 s

p10 92.8 s, p90 188.8 s

Reliability

86.7%

strict pass rate

SEO score

62.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

  • Reliability86.7
  • Agent performance83.0
  • Code ownership82.0

Three weakest axes

  • Speed23.1
  • SEO and GEO62.0
  • Value66.0

Median per prompt

135.7 s

p10 92.8 s, p90 188.8 s

Strict pass rate

86.7%

39 pass, 4 partial, 2 fail

Executions recorded

45

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

EUR 22.00

Cheapest plan that can finish the specification

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 73.42. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
AxisSubscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster medianScoreMedianWeight %Contribution
Agent performance83.075.01814.94
Reliability86.771.11815.61
Scalability80.070.01310.40
SEO and GEO62.058.0127.44
API and MCP71.062.096.39
Integrations77.066.086.16
Design output73.071.075.11
Speed23.133.071.62
Value66.076.053.30
Code ownership82.090.032.46

Speed distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Replit, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 68.2 smax 214.6 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 92.8 s / median 135.7 s / p90 188.8 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.39x.

Outcome split

39 pass / 4 partial / 2 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

HTML bytes, no JS

9.0 KB

9,216 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

2,880 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.120

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

62.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

Raw per run measurements
RunPromptPrompt targetStartedDuration (s)OutcomeNote
R01P01Tenant and user model11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC108.5pass
R01P02Authentication and session11 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC95.6pass
R01P03Projects CRUD with tenancy11 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC85.9pass
R01P04Public REST API with keys11 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC176.1pass
R01P05Outbound webhooks with signatures11 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC122.9pass
R01P06Background jobs11 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC104.6pass
R01P07Admin panel11 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC94.7pass
R01P08Public marketing surface11 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC192.7pass
R01P09Hardening pass11 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC102.4pass
R02P01Tenant and user model12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC91.5pass
R02P02Authentication and session12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC109.9pass
R02P03Projects CRUD with tenancy12 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC89.9pass
R02P04Public REST API with keys12 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC169.6pass
R02P05Outbound webhooks with signatures12 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC172.3pass
R02P06Background jobs12 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC197.4pass
R02P07Admin panel12 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC77.0partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R02P08Public marketing surface12 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC100.7pass
R02P09Hardening pass12 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC182.9pass
R03P01Tenant and user model13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC123.9pass
R03P02Authentication and session13 Aug 2026 08:04 UTC127.9pass
R03P03Projects CRUD with tenancy13 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC141.0pass
R03P04Public REST API with keys13 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC169.9pass
R03P05Outbound webhooks with signatures13 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC175.8failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R03P06Background jobs13 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC178.3partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R03P07Admin panel13 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC149.4pass
R03P08Public marketing surface13 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC174.0pass
R03P09Hardening pass13 Aug 2026 08:36 UTC150.0pass
R04P01Tenant and user model14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC116.2pass
R04P02Authentication and session14 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC139.3pass
R04P03Projects CRUD with tenancy14 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC135.7pass
R04P04Public REST API with keys14 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC126.9pass
R04P05Outbound webhooks with signatures14 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC139.5pass
R04P06Background jobs14 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC214.6pass
R04P07Admin panel14 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC101.9pass
R04P08Public marketing surface14 Aug 2026 08:30 UTC144.1pass
R04P09Hardening pass14 Aug 2026 08:34 UTC115.6pass
R05P01Tenant and user model15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC106.0pass
R05P02Authentication and session15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC201.6pass
R05P03Projects CRUD with tenancy15 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC96.6partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R05P04Public REST API with keys15 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC155.9pass
R05P05Outbound webhooks with signatures15 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC117.7partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R05P06Background jobs15 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC172.4pass
R05P07Admin panel15 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC137.5failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R05P08Public marketing surface15 Aug 2026 08:30 UTC199.1pass
R05P09Hardening pass15 Aug 2026 08:35 UTC68.2pass

Pricing

Free tier for prototypes. Core from EUR 22 per month including agent time, deployments and always on services.

Entry price
EUR 22.00
Value subscore
66.0
Index points per euro
3.34

Capabilities as measured

stack
Any, a full Linux workspace
deploy
Autoscale, reserved VM and scheduled deployments
database
Built in Postgres and key value store
auth
Built in identity plus libraries
background jobs
Yes, scheduled deployments and workers
webhooks
Hand written, full control
rest api
Hand written, full control
mcp server
Yes
export code
Full filesystem access and Git
custom domain
Yes
ssr
Depends on the framework the agent picks

Screenshot

Replit landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Replit landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Replit, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
SourceURLFetched
Replit pricing pagehttps://replit.com/pricing14 Aug 2026
Replit product sitehttps://replit.com14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness outputhttps://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.7 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Replit head to head

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Reader index

67.02

Lab index

73.42

3 readers, 25 axis scores, last change 15 Aug 2026. Readers rate Replit 6.4 points below the measurement.

Reader mean against the measured lab subscore for each axis
AxisWeightLabReadersVotesReader mean
Agent performance18%83.073.03
Reliability18%86.780.33
Scalability13%80.072.73
SEO and GEO12%62.057.73
API and MCP9%71.064.33
Integrations8%77.072.33
Speed7%23.118.73
Value5%66.066.01
Code ownership3%82.072.73

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

79.50

2 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

73.42

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

6.08

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

The most operationally complete result: a real queue, working scheduled jobs and a database that survived the 50000 row load without a rewrite. It is also the slowest of the top group because the agent runs a longer plan and test cycle. The public marketing surface was the weakest part, client rendered in 4 of 5 runs.

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 39 times, partially 4 times and failed 2 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.