The median turn latency is 65.2 seconds per prompt, not per whole build, which derives to 9.8 min across the full nine prompt specification. That is a tenth percentile of 44.9 seconds and a ninetieth percentile of 104.1 seconds across 45 recorded executions.

84.4% of recorded executions met the published pass criterion with no operator intervention. 6 were partial and 1 failed outright. Every one of those rows is published on this page.

Can I export the code from v0?

Full source, standard framework output. The code ownership subscore is 86.0 out of 100.

Full-stack app builders / rank 4 of 20 / cycle 04

v0 benchmark

Fastest median in the cohort and the highest blind design score by a clear margin. The weakness is operational: background jobs in prompt 6 were implemented as fire and forget route handlers in 4 of 5 runs, which is not a queue, and the admin panel needed manual work on staff gating.

Last run: 15 Aug 2026 09:11 UTCNext scheduled run: n/aOfficial site v0 reviews and ratings

Composite index

78.31

of 100 | withheld vs. cycle 03

Delta not shown for cycle 04: the roster was re-based from one merged ranking into two class boards, so cycle 03 and cycle 04 ranks are not on the same scale. Resumes cycle 05.

At a glance

Composite index

78.31

rank 4 of 20

Rank

of 20 on the full-stack app builders board

Median turn latency

65.2 s per prompt

9.8 min across the full nine prompt spec, derived

Reliability

84.4%

strict pass rate

SEO score

76.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

Turn latency score100.0
Design output94.0
Code ownership86.0

Three weakest axes

API and MCP60.0
Integrations66.0
Value68.0

Median turn latency

65.2 s per prompt

p10 44.9 s, p90 104.1 s

Strict pass rate

84.4%

38 pass, 6 partial, 1 fail

Executions recorded

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

USD 30 / user / month

Vendor's own unit and billing period. Never a currency conversion

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these 10 rows: 78.31. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand. Rounding rule: half up at two decimals, applied uniformly to all 37 published products.

Weight table

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
Axis	Score	Median	Weight %	Contribution
Agent performance	80.0	71.5	18	14.40
Reliability	84.4	71.1	18	15.19
Scalability	72.0	66.0	13	9.36
SEO and GEO	76.0	63.5	12	9.12
API and MCP	60.0	58.0	9	5.40
Integrations	66.0	65.0	8	5.28
Design output	94.0	78.5	7	6.58
Turn latency score	100.0	66.5	7	7.00
Value	68.0	74.0	5	3.40
Code ownership	86.0	73.0	3	2.58

Turn latency distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for v0, in seconds. Median wall clock time for one prompt, not for a whole build. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 34.5 smax 157.7 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 44.9 s / median 65.2 s / p90 104.1 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.60x.

Outcome split

38 pass / 6 partial / 1 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

SEO and GEO leaderboard

HTML bytes, no JS

27.0 KB

27,648 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

1,620 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.040

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

76.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points on this board

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

JSON

Raw per run measurements
Run	Prompt	Prompt target	Started	Duration (s)	Outcome	Note
R01	P01	Tenant and user model	11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	79.7	pass
R01	P02	Authentication and session	11 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC	43.0	partial	Validation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R01	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	11 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC	55.1	pass
R01	P04	Public REST API with keys	11 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC	47.5	pass
R01	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	11 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC	107.0	pass
R01	P06	Background jobs	11 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC	57.2	partial	Jobs implemented as fire and forget route handlers. No durable queue, work lost on redeploy.
R01	P07	Admin panel	11 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC	68.1	pass
R01	P08	Public marketing surface	11 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC	45.7	pass
R01	P09	Hardening pass	11 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC	37.4	pass
R02	P01	Tenant and user model	12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	65.2	pass
R02	P02	Authentication and session	12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC	73.0	pass
R02	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	12 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC	60.4	pass
R02	P04	Public REST API with keys	12 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC	83.8	pass
R02	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	12 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC	88.3	pass
R02	P06	Background jobs	12 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC	140.6	partial	Jobs implemented as fire and forget route handlers. No durable queue, work lost on redeploy.
R02	P07	Admin panel	12 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC	64.2	pass
R02	P08	Public marketing surface	12 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC	48.4	pass
R02	P09	Hardening pass	12 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC	45.8	pass
R03	P01	Tenant and user model	13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	70.5	pass
R03	P02	Authentication and session	13 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC	44.4	pass
R03	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	13 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC	58.3	pass
R03	P04	Public REST API with keys	13 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC	157.7	pass
R03	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	13 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC	85.8	pass
R03	P06	Background jobs	13 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC	82.2	partial	Jobs implemented as fire and forget route handlers. No durable queue, work lost on redeploy.
R03	P07	Admin panel	13 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC	113.4	pass
R03	P08	Public marketing surface	13 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC	38.7	partial	Pagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R03	P09	Hardening pass	13 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC	48.8	fail	Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R04	P01	Tenant and user model	14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	89.0	pass
R04	P02	Authentication and session	14 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC	90.8	pass
R04	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	14 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC	56.3	pass
R04	P04	Public REST API with keys	14 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC	53.4	pass
R04	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	14 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC	55.5	pass
R04	P06	Background jobs	14 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC	77.1	pass
R04	P07	Admin panel	14 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC	108.7	pass
R04	P08	Public marketing surface	14 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC	50.8	pass
R04	P09	Hardening pass	14 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC	34.5	pass
R05	P01	Tenant and user model	15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	46.4	pass
R05	P02	Authentication and session	15 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC	95.0	pass
R05	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	15 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC	81.8	pass
R05	P04	Public REST API with keys	15 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC	99.7	pass
R05	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	15 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC	81.3	pass
R05	P06	Background jobs	15 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC	55.8	partial	Jobs implemented as fire and forget route handlers. No durable queue, work lost on redeploy.
R05	P07	Admin panel	15 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC	85.5	pass
R05	P08	Public marketing surface	15 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC	53.3	pass
R05	P09	Hardening pass	15 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC	79.6	pass

Pricing

Free tier with monthly credits. Plus from USD 30 per user per month with usage based credits above the allowance.

Entry price: USD 30 / user / month
Priced from: vendor pricing page
Value subscore: 68.0
Index points per euro: 3.05

Entry price is the vendor's own published figure, fetched 06 Sep 2026, never a currency conversion. The currency label is the vendor's own except where the pricing note above records that this lab inferred it. Index points per euro is computed from a separate, euro-normalised figure used only for the Value axis: Converted at the European Central Bank euro reference rate of 1.1699 US dollars to the euro, August 21, 2026.

Capabilities as measured

stack: Next.js App Router
deploy: Hosted deploy with instant previews
database: Bring your own, first party Postgres integration
auth: Library based, wired on request
background jobs: Partial, no durable queue by default
webhooks: Hand written, no built in delivery log
rest api: Route handlers, no key management by default
mcp server: Yes
export code: Full source, standard framework output
custom domain: Yes
ssr: Server rendered by default

Screenshot

v0 landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

v0 landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

v0, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
Source	URL	Fetched
v0 pricing page	https://v0.app/pricing	14 Aug 2026
v0 product site	https://v0.app	14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness output	https://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json	14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.9 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

v0 head to head

lovable vs v0 bolt-new vs v0 youware vs v0

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Score it or read the notes

Reader index

80.68

Lab index

78.31

6 readers, 54 axis scores, last change 30 Aug 2026. Readers rate v0 2.4 points above the measurement.

Seeded at launch

The reader scores, lab notes and open ratings published here were written by this lab in August 2026 to populate the reader column before the site had readers. They are not customer submissions, they are not vendor supplied and nobody was paid for them. Anything submitted since then comes from a registered account. The lab index is measured from logged runs and is unaffected either way.

Reader mean against the measured lab subscore for each axis
Axis	Weight	Lab	Readers	Votes
Agent performance	18%	80.0	85.2	6
Reliability	18%	84.4	88.5	6
Scalability	13%	72.0	81.6	5
SEO and GEO	12%	76.0	85.7	6
API and MCP	9%	60.0	56.8	4
Integrations	8%	66.0	76.2	6
Design output	7%	94.0	100.0	5
Turn latency score	7%	100.0	53.7	6
Value	5%	68.0	75.5	6
Code ownership	3%	86.0	93.3	4

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

79.50

2 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

78.31

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

1.19

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 38 times, partially 6 times and failed 1 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.