How fast is Augment Code?

The median wall clock time is 71.6 seconds per prompt, with a tenth percentile of 44.9 seconds and a ninetieth percentile of 110.0 seconds across 45 recorded executions.

How reliable is Augment Code?

88.9% of recorded executions met the published pass criterion with no operator intervention. 3 were partial and 2 failed outright. Every one of those rows is published on this page.

Can I export the code from Augment Code?

The code was never anywhere else. The code ownership subscore is 97.0 out of 100.

coding-agent / rank 7 of 41 / cycle 04

Augment Code benchmark

Indexes a whole repository before it acts, and on a large codebase that is worth the wait: it found the existing tenancy helper in prompt 3 and reused it rather than writing a second one, which no other agent did in every run. The price is the highest in the agent group and the value subscore reflects it. On a small project the advantage largely disappears.

Last run: 14 Aug 2026 17:40 UTCNext scheduled run: 21 Aug 2026 09:00 UTCOfficial site Augment Code reviews and ratings

Composite index

75.92

of 100 | 0 versus cycle 03

At a glance

Composite index

75.92

rank 7 of 41

Rank

of 41 measured builders

Median speed

71.6 s

p10 44.9 s, p90 110.0 s

Reliability

88.9%

strict pass rate

SEO score

58.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

Code ownership97.0
Reliability88.9
Agent performance86.0

Three weakest axes

Speed43.9
SEO and GEO58.0
Design output62.0

Median per prompt

71.6 s

p10 44.9 s, p90 110.0 s

Strict pass rate

88.9%

40 pass, 3 partial, 2 fail

Executions recorded

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

EUR 45.00

Cheapest plan that can finish the specification

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 75.93. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.

Weight table

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
Axis	Score	Median	Weight %	Contribution
Agent performance	86.0	75.0	18	15.48
Reliability	88.9	71.1	18	16.00
Scalability	84.0	70.0	13	10.92
SEO and GEO	58.0	58.0	12	6.96
API and MCP	74.0	62.0	9	6.66
Integrations	76.0	66.0	8	6.08
Design output	62.0	71.0	7	4.34
Speed	43.9	33.0	7	3.07
Value	70.0	76.0	5	3.50
Code ownership	97.0	90.0	3	2.91

Speed distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Augment Code, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 33.8 smax 157.4 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 44.9 s / median 71.6 s / p90 110.0 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.54x.

Outcome split

40 pass / 3 partial / 2 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

SEO and GEO leaderboard

HTML bytes, no JS

22.0 KB

22,528 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

1,800 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.040

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

58.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

JSON

Raw per run measurements
Run	Prompt	Prompt target	Started	Duration (s)	Outcome	Note
R01	P01	Tenant and user model	11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	97.0	pass
R01	P02	Authentication and session	11 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC	99.2	pass
R01	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	11 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC	134.7	pass	Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff.
R01	P04	Public REST API with keys	11 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC	83.8	pass
R01	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	11 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC	65.1	pass
R01	P06	Background jobs	11 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC	70.8	fail	Deployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R01	P07	Admin panel	11 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC	89.5	pass
R01	P08	Public marketing surface	11 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC	82.4	partial	Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R01	P09	Hardening pass	11 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC	46.0	pass
R02	P01	Tenant and user model	12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	34.3	pass
R02	P02	Authentication and session	12 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC	71.6	pass
R02	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	12 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC	87.9	pass	Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff.
R02	P04	Public REST API with keys	12 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC	58.6	pass
R02	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	12 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC	48.8	pass
R02	P06	Background jobs	12 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC	51.1	pass
R02	P07	Admin panel	12 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC	135.1	pass
R02	P08	Public marketing surface	12 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC	51.2	pass
R02	P09	Hardening pass	12 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC	59.2	pass
R03	P01	Tenant and user model	13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	46.7	pass
R03	P02	Authentication and session	13 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC	103.6	pass
R03	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	13 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC	112.8	pass	Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff.
R03	P04	Public REST API with keys	13 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC	49.9	pass
R03	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	13 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC	44.3	partial	Pagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R03	P06	Background jobs	13 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC	82.9	partial	Delivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R03	P07	Admin panel	13 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC	48.8	pass
R03	P08	Public marketing surface	13 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC	72.3	pass
R03	P09	Hardening pass	13 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC	84.1	pass
R04	P01	Tenant and user model	14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	36.1	pass
R04	P02	Authentication and session	14 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC	57.6	pass
R04	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	14 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC	51.0	pass	Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff.
R04	P04	Public REST API with keys	14 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC	86.6	pass
R04	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	14 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC	67.1	fail	Task abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R04	P06	Background jobs	14 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC	84.5	pass
R04	P07	Admin panel	14 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC	157.4	pass
R04	P08	Public marketing surface	14 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC	45.8	pass
R04	P09	Hardening pass	14 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC	112.0	pass
R05	P01	Tenant and user model	15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC	106.9	pass
R05	P02	Authentication and session	15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC	68.4	pass
R05	P03	Projects CRUD with tenancy	15 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC	74.0	pass	Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff.
R05	P04	Public REST API with keys	15 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC	80.6	pass
R05	P05	Outbound webhooks with signatures	15 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC	33.8	pass
R05	P06	Background jobs	15 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC	83.4	pass
R05	P07	Admin panel	15 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC	103.0	pass
R05	P08	Public marketing surface	15 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC	34.8	pass
R05	P09	Hardening pass	15 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC	49.3	pass

Pricing

From EUR 45 per seat per month. There is a trial but no free tier of any size.

Entry price: EUR 45.00
Value subscore: 70.0
Index points per euro: 1.69

Capabilities as measured

stack: Your repository, any framework
deploy: Not included
database: Whatever you already run
auth: It reuses what your repository already has
background jobs: Implemented in your stack
webhooks: Signed with a delivery log
rest api: Written to your existing conventions
mcp server: Yes
export code: The code was never anywhere else
custom domain: Your hosting decides
ssr: Your framework decides

Screenshot

Augment Code landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Augment Code landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Augment Code, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
Source	URL	Fetched
Augment Code pricing page	https://augmentcode.com/pricing	14 Aug 2026
Augment Code product site	https://augmentcode.com	14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness output	https://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json	14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.8 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Augment Code head to head

augment-code vs cursor

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Score it or read the notes

Reader index

not rated yet

Lab index

75.92

2 readers have scored 100% of the index weight so far. A reader index is published at 3 voters and 50% coverage.

Reader mean against the measured lab subscore for each axis
Axis	Weight	Lab	Readers	Votes
Agent performance	18%	86.0	76.5	2
Reliability	18%	88.9	85.5	2
Scalability	13%	84.0	74.5	2
SEO and GEO	12%	58.0	53.0	2
API and MCP	9%	74.0	69.5	2
Integrations	8%	76.0	71.5	2
Design output	7%	62.0	62.0	1
Speed	7%	43.9	40.0	2
Value	5%	70.0	51.0	1
Code ownership	3%	97.0	93.5	2

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

n/a

0 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

75.92

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

n/a

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 40 times, partially 3 times and failed 2 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.