Coding agents / rank 4 of 17 / cycle 04
Augment Code benchmark
Indexes a whole repository before it acts, and on a large codebase that is worth the wait: it found the existing tenancy helper in prompt 3 and reused it rather than writing a second one, which no other agent did in every run. Pricing is flat for a team rather than per seat, so a single developer pays the same USD 20 as a team of fifty, which is what the value subscore reflects. On a small project the indexing advantage largely disappears.
Composite index
75.63
of 100 | withheld vs. cycle 03
Delta not shown for cycle 04: the roster was re-based from one merged ranking into two class boards, so cycle 03 and cycle 04 ranks are not on the same scale. Resumes cycle 05.
At a glance
Composite index
75.63
rank 4 of 17
Rank
#4
of 17 on the coding agents board
Median turn latency
71.6 s per prompt
10.7 min across the full nine prompt spec, derived
Reliability
88.9%
strict pass rate
SEO score
58.0
0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis
Three strongest axes
- Reliability88.9
- Agent performance86.0
- Scalability84.0
Three weakest axes
- Turn latency score43.9
- SEO and GEO58.0
- Design output62.0
Median turn latency
71.6 s per prompt
p10 44.9 s, p90 110.0 s
Strict pass rate
88.9%
40 pass, 3 partial, 2 fail
Executions recorded
45
5 runs of 9 prompts
Entry price
USD 20 / month, flat for a team up to 50 seats
Vendor's own unit and billing period. Never a currency conversion
Per axis subscores
Composite recomputed from these 9 rows: 75.63. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand. Rounding rule: half up at two decimals, applied uniformly to all 37 published products. Code ownership has no row here: it is not scored on this board.
| Axis | Subscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster median | Score | Median | Weight % | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 88.9 | 75.6 | 18.56 | 16.50 | |
| Agent performance | 86.0 | 80.0 | 18.55 | 15.95 | |
| Scalability | 84.0 | 74.0 | 13.4 | 11.26 | |
| SEO and GEO | 58.0 | 56.0 | 12.37 | 7.17 | |
| API and MCP | 74.0 | 70.0 | 9.28 | 6.87 | |
| Integrations | 76.0 | 70.0 | 8.25 | 6.27 | |
| Design output | 62.0 | 62.0 | 7.22 | 4.48 | |
| Turn latency score | 43.9 | 39.9 | 7.22 | 3.17 | |
| Value | 77.0 | 80.0 | 5.15 | 3.97 |
Turn latency distribution
Every recorded prompt duration for Augment Code, in seconds. Median wall clock time for one prompt, not for a whole build. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.
Spread against the cohort
p10 44.9 s / median 71.6 s / p90 110.0 s
Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.54x.
Outcome split
40 pass / 3 partial / 2 fail
SEO and GEO measurements
Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.
HTML bytes, no JS
22.0 KB
22,528 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked
LCP
1,800 ms
Throttled connection, cold cache
CLS
0.040
Cumulative layout shift on load
SEO and GEO subscore
58.0
0 to 100, worth 12.37 index points on this board
Raw run data: 45 executions
One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.
| Run | Prompt | Prompt target | Started | Duration (s) | Outcome | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R01 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 97.0 | pass | |
| R01 | P02 | Authentication and session | 11 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 99.2 | pass | |
| R01 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 11 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC | 134.7 | pass | Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff. |
| R01 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 11 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC | 83.8 | pass | |
| R01 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 11 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC | 65.1 | pass | |
| R01 | P06 | Background jobs | 11 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC | 70.8 | fail | Deployed URL returned 500 on every request. |
| R01 | P07 | Admin panel | 11 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC | 89.5 | pass | |
| R01 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 11 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC | 82.4 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R01 | P09 | Hardening pass | 11 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC | 46.0 | pass | |
| R02 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 34.3 | pass | |
| R02 | P02 | Authentication and session | 12 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC | 71.6 | pass | |
| R02 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 12 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC | 87.9 | pass | Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff. |
| R02 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 12 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC | 58.6 | pass | |
| R02 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 12 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC | 48.8 | pass | |
| R02 | P06 | Background jobs | 12 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC | 51.1 | pass | |
| R02 | P07 | Admin panel | 12 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC | 135.1 | pass | |
| R02 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 12 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC | 51.2 | pass | |
| R02 | P09 | Hardening pass | 12 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC | 59.2 | pass | |
| R03 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 46.7 | pass | |
| R03 | P02 | Authentication and session | 13 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC | 103.6 | pass | |
| R03 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 13 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 112.8 | pass | Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff. |
| R03 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 13 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC | 49.9 | pass | |
| R03 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 13 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC | 44.3 | partial | Pagination off by one at the final page boundary. |
| R03 | P06 | Background jobs | 13 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC | 82.9 | partial | Delivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria. |
| R03 | P07 | Admin panel | 13 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC | 48.8 | pass | |
| R03 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 13 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC | 72.3 | pass | |
| R03 | P09 | Hardening pass | 13 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 84.1 | pass | |
| R04 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 36.1 | pass | |
| R04 | P02 | Authentication and session | 14 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC | 57.6 | pass | |
| R04 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 14 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC | 51.0 | pass | Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff. |
| R04 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 14 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC | 86.6 | pass | |
| R04 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 14 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC | 67.1 | fail | Task abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced. |
| R04 | P06 | Background jobs | 14 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC | 84.5 | pass | |
| R04 | P07 | Admin panel | 14 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC | 157.4 | pass | |
| R04 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 14 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC | 45.8 | pass | |
| R04 | P09 | Hardening pass | 14 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 112.0 | pass | |
| R05 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 106.9 | pass | |
| R05 | P02 | Authentication and session | 15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 68.4 | pass | |
| R05 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 15 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 74.0 | pass | Reused the existing tenancy helper instead of writing a second one. No duplicate policy code in the diff. |
| R05 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 15 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC | 80.6 | pass | |
| R05 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 15 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC | 33.8 | pass | |
| R05 | P06 | Background jobs | 15 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC | 83.4 | pass | |
| R05 | P07 | Admin panel | 15 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC | 103.0 | pass | |
| R05 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 15 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC | 34.8 | pass | |
| R05 | P09 | Hardening pass | 15 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 49.3 | pass |
Pricing
From USD 20 per month on the Standard plan, flat for a team up to 50 seats. There is a trial but no free tier of any size.
Pricing note
Augment prices flat for a whole team rather than per seat: Standard is USD 20 a month covering up to 50 seats, with USD 20 of metered usage included and top-ups charged as you go. Business is USD 100 a month on the same up-to-50-seats shape. There is no individual tier and no free tier.
- Entry price
- USD 20 / month, flat for a team up to 50 seats
- Priced from
- vendor pricing page
- Value subscore
- 77.0
- Index points per euro
- 4.42
Entry price is the vendor's own published figure, fetched 05 Sep 2026, never a currency conversion. The currency label is the vendor's own except where the pricing note above records that this lab inferred it. Index points per euro is computed from a separate, euro-normalised figure used only for the Value axis: Converted at the European Central Bank euro reference rate of 1.1699 US dollars to the euro, August 21, 2026.
Capabilities as measured
- stack
- Your repository, any framework
- deploy
- Not included
- database
- Whatever you already run
- auth
- It reuses what your repository already has
- background jobs
- Implemented in your stack
- webhooks
- Signed with a delivery log
- rest api
- Written to your existing conventions
- mcp server
- Yes
- export code
- The code was never anywhere else
- custom domain
- Your hosting decides
- ssr
- Your framework decides
Screenshot
Augment Code landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.
Augment Code, captured 14 Aug 2026.
Sources and fetch dates
Every claim on this page traces to one of these.
| Source | URL | Fetched |
|---|---|---|
| Augment Code pricing page | https://augmentcode.com/pricing | 14 Aug 2026 |
| Augment Code product site | https://augmentcode.com | 14 Aug 2026 |
| LLM Tier run harness output | https://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json | 14 Aug 2026 |
Rich results carry this composite as 3.8 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.
Augment Code head to head
Reader index
Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.
Reader index
not rated yet
Lab index
75.63
2 readers have scored 100% of the index weight so far. A reader index is published at 3 voters and 50% coverage.
Seeded at launch
The reader scores, lab notes and open ratings published here were written by this lab in August 2026 to populate the reader column before the site had readers. They are not customer submissions, they are not vendor supplied and nobody was paid for them. Anything submitted since then comes from a registered account. The lab index is measured from logged runs and is unaffected either way.
| Axis | Weight | Lab | Readers | Votes | Reader mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 18.55% | 86.0 | 76.5 | 2 | |
| Reliability | 18.56% | 88.9 | 85.5 | 2 | |
| Scalability | 13.4% | 84.0 | 74.5 | 2 | |
| SEO and GEO | 12.37% | 58.0 | 53.0 | 2 | |
| API and MCP | 9.28% | 74.0 | 69.5 | 2 | |
| Integrations | 8.25% | 76.0 | 71.5 | 2 | |
| Design output | 7.22% | 62.0 | 62.0 | 1 | |
| Turn latency score | 7.22% | 43.9 | 40.0 | 2 | |
| Value | 5.15% | 77.0 | 51.0 | 1 |
The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.
Open rating mean
n/a
0 published open ratings, submitted without an account
Lab index
75.63
Measured, not voted
Gap to the measurement
n/a
Positive means open raters put it above the measurement
What agent performance looked like in practice
Indexes a whole repository before it acts, and on a large codebase that is worth the wait: it found the existing tenancy helper in prompt 3 and reused it rather than writing a second one, which no other agent did in every run. Pricing is flat for a team rather than per seat, so a single developer pays the same USD 20 as a team of fifty, which is what the value subscore reflects. On a small project the indexing advantage largely disappears.
Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 40 times, partially 3 times and failed 2 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.