Dyad logo

fullstack-builder / rank 28 of 41 / cycle 04

Dyad benchmark

Runs on your own machine against your own model key, which makes it one of the cheapest routes through the spec and gives it a code ownership score that hosted products cannot match: there is no platform to leave. The trade is variance, since throughput depends on the key you point it at, and there is no managed runtime to catch a bad deploy.

Last run: 14 Aug 2026 17:40 UTCNext scheduled run: 21 Aug 2026 09:00 UTCOfficial siteDyad reviews and ratings

Composite index

64.77

of 100 | 1 versus cycle 03

At a glance

Composite index

64.77

rank 28 of 41

Rank

#28

of 41 measured builders

Median speed

83.8 s

p10 54.4 s, p90 149.9 s

Reliability

55.6%

strict pass rate

SEO score

72.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

  • Code ownership98.0
  • Value92.0
  • SEO and GEO72.0

Three weakest axes

  • Speed37.5
  • Reliability55.6
  • API and MCP60.0

Median per prompt

83.8 s

p10 54.4 s, p90 149.9 s

Strict pass rate

55.6%

25 pass, 10 partial, 10 fail

Executions recorded

45

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

EUR 0.00

Cheapest plan that can finish the specification

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 64.77. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
AxisSubscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster medianScoreMedianWeight %Contribution
Agent performance68.075.01812.24
Reliability55.671.11810.01
Scalability64.070.0138.32
SEO and GEO72.058.0128.64
API and MCP60.062.095.40
Integrations62.066.084.96
Design output72.071.075.04
Speed37.533.072.63
Value92.076.054.60
Code ownership98.090.032.94

Speed distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Dyad, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 18.0 smax 265.4 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 54.4 s / median 83.8 s / p90 149.9 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.79x.

Outcome split

25 pass / 10 partial / 10 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

HTML bytes, no JS

20.0 KB

20,480 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

1,880 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.040

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

72.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

Raw per run measurements
RunPromptPrompt targetStartedDuration (s)OutcomeNote
R01P01Tenant and user model11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC143.9partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R01P02Authentication and session11 Aug 2026 08:04 UTC51.9failAgent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes.
R01P03Projects CRUD with tenancy11 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC129.4partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R01P04Public REST API with keys11 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC153.9partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R01P05Outbound webhooks with signatures11 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC79.2pass
R01P06Background jobs11 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC77.9pass
R01P07Admin panel11 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC78.0pass
R01P08Public marketing surface11 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC91.5partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R01P09Hardening pass11 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC83.8pass
R02P01Tenant and user model12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC86.5pass
R02P02Authentication and session12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC58.5failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R02P03Projects CRUD with tenancy12 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC67.4pass
R02P04Public REST API with keys12 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC98.3pass
R02P05Outbound webhooks with signatures12 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC159.4pass
R02P06Background jobs12 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC93.6failDeployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R02P07Admin panel12 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC78.9pass
R02P08Public marketing surface12 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC18.0pass
R02P09Hardening pass12 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC89.6failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R03P01Tenant and user model13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC53.4partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R03P02Authentication and session13 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC87.7pass
R03P03Projects CRUD with tenancy13 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC184.7partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R03P04Public REST API with keys13 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC100.4failDeployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R03P05Outbound webhooks with signatures13 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC265.4partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R03P06Background jobs13 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC81.3pass
R03P07Admin panel13 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC129.1pass
R03P08Public marketing surface13 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC30.9failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R03P09Hardening pass13 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC78.3pass
R04P01Tenant and user model14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC80.8pass
R04P02Authentication and session14 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC70.7pass
R04P03Projects CRUD with tenancy14 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC56.0partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R04P04Public REST API with keys14 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC138.3pass
R04P05Outbound webhooks with signatures14 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC59.2pass
R04P06Background jobs14 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC124.8failAgent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes.
R04P07Admin panel14 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC64.2pass
R04P08Public marketing surface14 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC95.5pass
R04P09Hardening pass14 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC110.4pass
R05P01Tenant and user model15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC97.2pass
R05P02Authentication and session15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC41.4pass
R05P03Projects CRUD with tenancy15 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC95.1partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R05P04Public REST API with keys15 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC206.7partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R05P05Outbound webhooks with signatures15 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC61.7failBuild did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved.
R05P06Background jobs15 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC108.3pass
R05P07Admin panel15 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC62.8failDeployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R05P08Public marketing surface15 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC58.6pass
R05P09Hardening pass15 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC71.5failBuild did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved.

Pricing

Free and open source. You supply your own model key, so the only cost is the tokens you spend.

Entry price
EUR 0.00
Value subscore
92.0
Index points per euro
64.77

Capabilities as measured

stack
Local project, framework of your choice
deploy
You deploy it, no hosting included
database
Bring your own
auth
Bring your own
background jobs
Whatever you install
webhooks
Hand written
rest api
Hand written
mcp server
Yes
export code
There is nothing to export, it is already yours
custom domain
Your hosting decides
ssr
Your framework decides

Screenshot

Dyad landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Dyad landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Dyad, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
SourceURLFetched
Dyad pricing pagehttps://dyad.sh/pricing14 Aug 2026
Dyad product sitehttps://dyad.sh14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness outputhttps://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.2 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Dyad head to head

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Reader index

72.53

Lab index

64.77

3 readers, 28 axis scores, last change 12 Aug 2026. Readers rate Dyad 7.8 points above the measurement.

Reader mean against the measured lab subscore for each axis
AxisWeightLabReadersVotesReader mean
Agent performance18%68.078.33
Reliability18%55.662.73
Scalability13%64.068.01
SEO and GEO12%72.079.33
API and MCP9%60.066.33
Integrations8%62.074.73
Design output7%72.080.03
Speed7%37.546.33
Value5%92.0100.03
Code ownership3%98.0100.03

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

n/a

0 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

64.77

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

n/a

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

Runs on your own machine against your own model key, which makes it one of the cheapest routes through the spec and gives it a code ownership score that hosted products cannot match: there is no platform to leave. The trade is variance, since throughput depends on the key you point it at, and there is no managed runtime to catch a bad deploy.

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 25 times, partially 10 times and failed 10 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.