fullstack-builder / rank 28 of 41 / cycle 04
Dyad benchmark
Runs on your own machine against your own model key, which makes it one of the cheapest routes through the spec and gives it a code ownership score that hosted products cannot match: there is no platform to leave. The trade is variance, since throughput depends on the key you point it at, and there is no managed runtime to catch a bad deploy.
Composite index
64.77
of 100 | ▲ 1 versus cycle 03
At a glance
Composite index
64.77
rank 28 of 41
Rank
#28
of 41 measured builders
Median speed
83.8 s
p10 54.4 s, p90 149.9 s
Reliability
55.6%
strict pass rate
SEO score
72.0
0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis
Three strongest axes
- Code ownership98.0
- Value92.0
- SEO and GEO72.0
Three weakest axes
- Speed37.5
- Reliability55.6
- API and MCP60.0
Median per prompt
83.8 s
p10 54.4 s, p90 149.9 s
Strict pass rate
55.6%
25 pass, 10 partial, 10 fail
Executions recorded
45
5 runs of 9 prompts
Entry price
EUR 0.00
Cheapest plan that can finish the specification
Per axis subscores
Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 64.77. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.
| Axis | Subscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster median | Score | Median | Weight % | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 68.0 | 75.0 | 18 | 12.24 | |
| Reliability | 55.6 | 71.1 | 18 | 10.01 | |
| Scalability | 64.0 | 70.0 | 13 | 8.32 | |
| SEO and GEO | 72.0 | 58.0 | 12 | 8.64 | |
| API and MCP | 60.0 | 62.0 | 9 | 5.40 | |
| Integrations | 62.0 | 66.0 | 8 | 4.96 | |
| Design output | 72.0 | 71.0 | 7 | 5.04 | |
| Speed | 37.5 | 33.0 | 7 | 2.63 | |
| Value | 92.0 | 76.0 | 5 | 4.60 | |
| Code ownership | 98.0 | 90.0 | 3 | 2.94 |
Speed distribution
Every recorded prompt duration for Dyad, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.
Spread against the cohort
p10 54.4 s / median 83.8 s / p90 149.9 s
Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.79x.
Outcome split
25 pass / 10 partial / 10 fail
SEO and GEO measurements
Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.
HTML bytes, no JS
20.0 KB
20,480 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked
LCP
1,880 ms
Throttled connection, cold cache
CLS
0.040
Cumulative layout shift on load
SEO and GEO subscore
72.0
0 to 100, worth 12 index points
Raw run data: 45 executions
One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.
| Run | Prompt | Prompt target | Started | Duration (s) | Outcome | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R01 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 143.9 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R01 | P02 | Authentication and session | 11 Aug 2026 08:04 UTC | 51.9 | fail | Agent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes. |
| R01 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 11 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC | 129.4 | partial | Required one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met. |
| R01 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 11 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC | 153.9 | partial | Pagination off by one at the final page boundary. |
| R01 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 11 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC | 79.2 | pass | |
| R01 | P06 | Background jobs | 11 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC | 77.9 | pass | |
| R01 | P07 | Admin panel | 11 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC | 78.0 | pass | |
| R01 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 11 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 91.5 | partial | Validation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded. |
| R01 | P09 | Hardening pass | 11 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC | 83.8 | pass | |
| R02 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 86.5 | pass | |
| R02 | P02 | Authentication and session | 12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 58.5 | fail | Task abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced. |
| R02 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 12 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 67.4 | pass | |
| R02 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 12 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC | 98.3 | pass | |
| R02 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 12 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC | 159.4 | pass | |
| R02 | P06 | Background jobs | 12 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC | 93.6 | fail | Deployed URL returned 500 on every request. |
| R02 | P07 | Admin panel | 12 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC | 78.9 | pass | |
| R02 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 12 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC | 18.0 | pass | |
| R02 | P09 | Hardening pass | 12 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC | 89.6 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R03 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 53.4 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R03 | P02 | Authentication and session | 13 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC | 87.7 | pass | |
| R03 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 13 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 184.7 | partial | Validation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded. |
| R03 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 13 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC | 100.4 | fail | Deployed URL returned 500 on every request. |
| R03 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 13 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC | 265.4 | partial | Pagination off by one at the final page boundary. |
| R03 | P06 | Background jobs | 13 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC | 81.3 | pass | |
| R03 | P07 | Admin panel | 13 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC | 129.1 | pass | |
| R03 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 13 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC | 30.9 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R03 | P09 | Hardening pass | 13 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC | 78.3 | pass | |
| R04 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 80.8 | pass | |
| R04 | P02 | Authentication and session | 14 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 70.7 | pass | |
| R04 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 14 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 56.0 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R04 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 14 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC | 138.3 | pass | |
| R04 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 14 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC | 59.2 | pass | |
| R04 | P06 | Background jobs | 14 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC | 124.8 | fail | Agent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes. |
| R04 | P07 | Admin panel | 14 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC | 64.2 | pass | |
| R04 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 14 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC | 95.5 | pass | |
| R04 | P09 | Hardening pass | 14 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC | 110.4 | pass | |
| R05 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 97.2 | pass | |
| R05 | P02 | Authentication and session | 15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 41.4 | pass | |
| R05 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 15 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 95.1 | partial | Validation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded. |
| R05 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 15 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC | 206.7 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R05 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 15 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC | 61.7 | fail | Build did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved. |
| R05 | P06 | Background jobs | 15 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC | 108.3 | pass | |
| R05 | P07 | Admin panel | 15 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC | 62.8 | fail | Deployed URL returned 500 on every request. |
| R05 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 15 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 58.6 | pass | |
| R05 | P09 | Hardening pass | 15 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC | 71.5 | fail | Build did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved. |
Pricing
Free and open source. You supply your own model key, so the only cost is the tokens you spend.
- Entry price
- EUR 0.00
- Value subscore
- 92.0
- Index points per euro
- 64.77
Capabilities as measured
- stack
- Local project, framework of your choice
- deploy
- You deploy it, no hosting included
- database
- Bring your own
- auth
- Bring your own
- background jobs
- Whatever you install
- webhooks
- Hand written
- rest api
- Hand written
- mcp server
- Yes
- export code
- There is nothing to export, it is already yours
- custom domain
- Your hosting decides
- ssr
- Your framework decides
Screenshot
Dyad landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Dyad, captured 14 Aug 2026.
Sources and fetch dates
Every claim on this page traces to one of these.
| Source | URL | Fetched |
|---|---|---|
| Dyad pricing page | https://dyad.sh/pricing | 14 Aug 2026 |
| Dyad product site | https://dyad.sh | 14 Aug 2026 |
| LLM Tier run harness output | https://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json | 14 Aug 2026 |
Rich results carry this composite as 3.2 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.
Dyad head to head
Reader index
Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.
Reader index
72.53
Lab index
64.77
3 readers, 28 axis scores, last change 12 Aug 2026. Readers rate Dyad 7.8 points above the measurement.
| Axis | Weight | Lab | Readers | Votes | Reader mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 18% | 68.0 | 78.3 | 3 | |
| Reliability | 18% | 55.6 | 62.7 | 3 | |
| Scalability | 13% | 64.0 | 68.0 | 1 | |
| SEO and GEO | 12% | 72.0 | 79.3 | 3 | |
| API and MCP | 9% | 60.0 | 66.3 | 3 | |
| Integrations | 8% | 62.0 | 74.7 | 3 | |
| Design output | 7% | 72.0 | 80.0 | 3 | |
| Speed | 7% | 37.5 | 46.3 | 3 | |
| Value | 5% | 92.0 | 100.0 | 3 | |
| Code ownership | 3% | 98.0 | 100.0 | 3 |
The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.
Open rating mean
n/a
0 published open ratings, submitted without an account
Lab index
64.77
Measured, not voted
Gap to the measurement
n/a
Positive means open raters put it above the measurement
What agent performance looked like in practice
Runs on your own machine against your own model key, which makes it one of the cheapest routes through the spec and gives it a code ownership score that hosted products cannot match: there is no platform to leave. The trade is variance, since throughput depends on the key you point it at, and there is no managed runtime to catch a bad deploy.
Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 25 times, partially 10 times and failed 10 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.