coding-agent / rank 27 of 41 / cycle 04
OpenHands benchmark
Open source and self hostable, and the only agent here whose sandbox runtime can be run entirely inside your own network. It is slower and less consistent than the commercial agents, and the spread reflects a sandbox that occasionally has to be rebuilt mid task. For anyone who cannot send a repository to a third party it is the strongest option in the index.
Composite index
65.18
of 100 | ▲ 1 versus cycle 03
At a glance
Composite index
65.18
rank 27 of 41
Rank
#27
of 41 measured builders
Median speed
144.8 s
p10 81.4 s, p90 269.1 s
Reliability
64.4%
strict pass rate
SEO score
56.0
0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis
Three strongest axes
- Code ownership99.0
- Value90.0
- Agent performance74.0
Three weakest axes
- Speed21.7
- SEO and GEO56.0
- Design output58.0
Median per prompt
144.8 s
p10 81.4 s, p90 269.1 s
Strict pass rate
64.4%
29 pass, 9 partial, 7 fail
Executions recorded
45
5 runs of 9 prompts
Entry price
EUR 0.00
Cheapest plan that can finish the specification
Per axis subscores
Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 65.18. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.
| Axis | Subscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster median | Score | Median | Weight % | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 74.0 | 75.0 | 18 | 13.32 | |
| Reliability | 64.4 | 71.1 | 18 | 11.59 | |
| Scalability | 70.0 | 70.0 | 13 | 9.10 | |
| SEO and GEO | 56.0 | 58.0 | 12 | 6.72 | |
| API and MCP | 68.0 | 62.0 | 9 | 6.12 | |
| Integrations | 66.0 | 66.0 | 8 | 5.28 | |
| Design output | 58.0 | 71.0 | 7 | 4.06 | |
| Speed | 21.7 | 33.0 | 7 | 1.52 | |
| Value | 90.0 | 76.0 | 5 | 4.50 | |
| Code ownership | 99.0 | 90.0 | 3 | 2.97 |
Speed distribution
Every recorded prompt duration for OpenHands, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.
Spread against the cohort
p10 81.4 s / median 144.8 s / p90 269.1 s
Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.86x.
Outcome split
29 pass / 9 partial / 7 fail
SEO and GEO measurements
Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.
HTML bytes, no JS
18.0 KB
18,432 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked
LCP
1,980 ms
Throttled connection, cold cache
CLS
0.050
Cumulative layout shift on load
SEO and GEO subscore
56.0
0 to 100, worth 12 index points
Raw run data: 45 executions
One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.
| Run | Prompt | Prompt target | Started | Duration (s) | Outcome | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R01 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 99.8 | fail | Build did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved. |
| R01 | P02 | Authentication and session | 11 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 144.8 | pass | |
| R01 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 11 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC | 130.6 | pass | |
| R01 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 11 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC | 90.7 | pass | |
| R01 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 11 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC | 89.4 | fail | Task abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced. |
| R01 | P06 | Background jobs | 11 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC | 146.5 | pass | |
| R01 | P07 | Admin panel | 11 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC | 403.4 | partial | Delivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria. |
| R01 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 11 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC | 183.0 | pass | |
| R01 | P09 | Hardening pass | 11 Aug 2026 08:37 UTC | 141.4 | pass | |
| R02 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 69.0 | pass | |
| R02 | P02 | Authentication and session | 12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 138.8 | pass | |
| R02 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 12 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC | 125.2 | pass | |
| R02 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 12 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC | 257.4 | pass | |
| R02 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 12 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC | 536.6 | partial | Pagination off by one at the final page boundary. |
| R02 | P06 | Background jobs | 12 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC | 251.6 | pass | |
| R02 | P07 | Admin panel | 12 Aug 2026 08:34 UTC | 214.9 | pass | |
| R02 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 12 Aug 2026 08:40 UTC | 76.5 | pass | |
| R02 | P09 | Hardening pass | 12 Aug 2026 08:43 UTC | 126.4 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R03 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 147.9 | pass | |
| R03 | P02 | Authentication and session | 13 Aug 2026 08:04 UTC | 66.4 | pass | |
| R03 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 13 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC | 88.7 | pass | |
| R03 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 13 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC | 62.8 | pass | |
| R03 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 13 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC | 242.1 | pass | |
| R03 | P06 | Background jobs | 13 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC | 120.5 | partial | Required one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met. |
| R03 | P07 | Admin panel | 13 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC | 159.7 | pass | |
| R03 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 13 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC | 295.3 | pass | |
| R03 | P09 | Hardening pass | 13 Aug 2026 08:35 UTC | 99.9 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R04 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 88.9 | pass | |
| R04 | P02 | Authentication and session | 14 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 196.4 | partial | Pagination off by one at the final page boundary. |
| R04 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 14 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC | 75.3 | pass | |
| R04 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 14 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC | 216.4 | fail | Task abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced. |
| R04 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 14 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC | 115.3 | partial | Required one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met. |
| R04 | P06 | Background jobs | 14 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC | 188.9 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R04 | P07 | Admin panel | 14 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC | 256.1 | partial | Delivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria. |
| R04 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 14 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC | 149.0 | partial | Delivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria. |
| R04 | P09 | Hardening pass | 14 Aug 2026 08:37 UTC | 125.3 | pass | |
| R05 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 216.3 | pass | |
| R05 | P02 | Authentication and session | 15 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC | 264.3 | fail | Task abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced. |
| R05 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 15 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC | 288.0 | pass | |
| R05 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 15 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC | 168.3 | partial | Delivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria. |
| R05 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 15 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC | 215.2 | pass | |
| R05 | P06 | Background jobs | 15 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC | 94.3 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R05 | P07 | Admin panel | 15 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC | 116.5 | pass | |
| R05 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 15 Aug 2026 08:36 UTC | 131.6 | pass | |
| R05 | P09 | Hardening pass | 15 Aug 2026 08:40 UTC | 272.3 | pass |
Pricing
Free and open source, self hosted. A managed cloud option is metered. You supply the model key either way.
- Entry price
- EUR 0.00
- Value subscore
- 90.0
- Index points per euro
- 65.18
Capabilities as measured
- stack
- Your repository, any framework
- deploy
- Self hosted runtime
- database
- Whatever you already run
- auth
- It wires the library you choose
- background jobs
- Implemented in your stack
- webhooks
- Written, signing on request
- rest api
- Written to your conventions
- mcp server
- Yes
- export code
- Fully open source, nothing leaves your network
- custom domain
- Your hosting decides
- ssr
- Your framework decides
Screenshot
OpenHands landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

OpenHands, captured 14 Aug 2026.
Sources and fetch dates
Every claim on this page traces to one of these.
| Source | URL | Fetched |
|---|---|---|
| OpenHands pricing page | https://openhands.dev/pricing | 14 Aug 2026 |
| OpenHands product site | https://openhands.dev | 14 Aug 2026 |
| LLM Tier run harness output | https://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json | 14 Aug 2026 |
Rich results carry this composite as 3.3 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.
Reader index
Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.
Reader index
not rated yet
Lab index
65.18
2 readers have scored 100% of the index weight so far. A reader index is published at 3 voters and 50% coverage.
| Axis | Weight | Lab | Readers | Votes | Reader mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 18% | 74.0 | 74.0 | 2 | |
| Reliability | 18% | 64.4 | 66.5 | 2 | |
| Scalability | 13% | 70.0 | 69.0 | 1 | |
| SEO and GEO | 12% | 56.0 | 56.0 | 2 | |
| API and MCP | 9% | 68.0 | 75.0 | 2 | |
| Integrations | 8% | 66.0 | 69.5 | 2 | |
| Design output | 7% | 58.0 | 56.5 | 2 | |
| Speed | 7% | 21.7 | 25.0 | 2 | |
| Value | 5% | 90.0 | 90.0 | 2 | |
| Code ownership | 3% | 99.0 | 96.5 | 2 |
The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.
Open rating mean
n/a
0 published open ratings, submitted without an account
Lab index
65.18
Measured, not voted
Gap to the measurement
n/a
Positive means open raters put it above the measurement
What agent performance looked like in practice
Open source and self hostable, and the only agent here whose sandbox runtime can be run entirely inside your own network. It is slower and less consistent than the commercial agents, and the spread reflects a sandbox that occasionally has to be rebuilt mid task. For anyone who cannot send a repository to a third party it is the strongest option in the index.
Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 29 times, partially 9 times and failed 7 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.