Tesslate logo

fullstack-builder / rank 34 of 41 / cycle 04

Tesslate benchmark

Design first, and it shows: the third highest blind design score in the index, with component structure a human would not be embarrassed to inherit. Behind the interface it is thin, and the generated data layer needed manual work to survive the volume test in prompt 8. Open weights behind part of the product, which lifts the code ownership subscore.

Last run: 14 Aug 2026 17:40 UTCNext scheduled run: 21 Aug 2026 09:00 UTCOfficial siteTesslate reviews and ratings

Composite index

59.33

of 100 | 1 versus cycle 03

At a glance

Composite index

59.33

rank 34 of 41

Rank

#34

of 41 measured builders

Median speed

90.3 s

p10 53.4 s, p90 168.5 s

Reliability

53.3%

strict pass rate

SEO score

64.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

  • Design output86.0
  • Code ownership76.0
  • Value74.0

Three weakest axes

  • Speed34.8
  • API and MCP50.0
  • Reliability53.3

Median per prompt

90.3 s

p10 53.4 s, p90 168.5 s

Strict pass rate

53.3%

24 pass, 8 partial, 13 fail

Executions recorded

45

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

EUR 16.00

Cheapest plan that can finish the specification

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 59.33. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
AxisSubscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster medianScoreMedianWeight %Contribution
Agent performance64.075.01811.52
Reliability53.371.1189.59
Scalability56.070.0137.28
SEO and GEO64.058.0127.68
API and MCP50.062.094.50
Integrations54.066.084.32
Design output86.071.076.02
Speed34.833.072.44
Value74.076.053.70
Code ownership76.090.032.28

Speed distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Tesslate, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 48.3 smax 251.6 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 53.4 s / median 90.3 s / p90 168.5 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.87x.

Outcome split

24 pass / 8 partial / 13 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

HTML bytes, no JS

16.0 KB

16,384 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

2,060 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.060

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

64.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

Raw per run measurements
RunPromptPrompt targetStartedDuration (s)OutcomeNote
R01P01Tenant and user model11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC48.3failAgent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes.
R01P02Authentication and session11 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC69.0failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R01P03Projects CRUD with tenancy11 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC94.7pass
R01P04Public REST API with keys11 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC89.6partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R01P05Outbound webhooks with signatures11 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC53.0pass
R01P06Background jobs11 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC106.0partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R01P07Admin panel11 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC92.5partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R01P08Public marketing surface11 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC87.7partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R01P09Hardening pass11 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC75.3failAgent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes.
R02P01Tenant and user model12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC108.9partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R02P02Authentication and session12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC117.6failDeployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R02P03Projects CRUD with tenancy12 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC109.7partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R02P04Public REST API with keys12 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC124.4pass
R02P05Outbound webhooks with signatures12 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC49.2failBuild did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved.
R02P06Background jobs12 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC209.3failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R02P07Admin panel12 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC96.1pass
R02P08Public marketing surface12 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC169.2pass
R02P09Hardening pass12 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC68.9pass
R03P01Tenant and user model13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC65.3failBuild did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved.
R03P02Authentication and session13 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC169.4pass
R03P03Projects CRUD with tenancy13 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC128.4pass
R03P04Public REST API with keys13 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC92.7pass
R03P05Outbound webhooks with signatures13 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC251.6failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R03P06Background jobs13 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC135.7failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R03P07Admin panel13 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC92.6pass
R03P08Public marketing surface13 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC54.0pass
R03P09Hardening pass13 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC67.2pass
R04P01Tenant and user model14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC77.7pass
R04P02Authentication and session14 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC60.3partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R04P03Projects CRUD with tenancy14 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC76.1failAgent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes.
R04P04Public REST API with keys14 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC172.2failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R04P05Outbound webhooks with signatures14 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC112.1failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R04P06Background jobs14 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC68.6pass
R04P07Admin panel14 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC50.3pass
R04P08Public marketing surface14 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC52.2pass
R04P09Hardening pass14 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC101.5pass
R05P01Tenant and user model15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC61.8pass
R05P02Authentication and session15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC83.1pass
R05P03Projects CRUD with tenancy15 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC84.1partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R05P04Public REST API with keys15 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC167.5failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R05P05Outbound webhooks with signatures15 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC111.1pass
R05P06Background jobs15 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC90.3pass
R05P07Admin panel15 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC150.5pass
R05P08Public marketing surface15 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC69.3pass
R05P09Hardening pass15 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC70.6pass

Pricing

Free tier for small projects. Paid plans from EUR 16 per month.

Entry price
EUR 16.00
Value subscore
74.0
Index points per euro
3.71

Capabilities as measured

stack
React with generated component library
deploy
Hosted deploy
database
Bring your own or built in tables
auth
Wired on request
background jobs
No
webhooks
Hand written
rest api
Route handlers
mcp server
Partial
export code
Full source export
custom domain
Yes
ssr
Server rendered by default

Screenshot

Tesslate landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Tesslate landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Tesslate, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
SourceURLFetched
Tesslate pricing pagehttps://tesslate.com/pricing14 Aug 2026
Tesslate product sitehttps://tesslate.com14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness outputhttps://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.0 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Reader index

not rated yet

Lab index

59.33

2 readers have scored 88% of the index weight so far. A reader index is published at 3 voters and 50% coverage.

Reader mean against the measured lab subscore for each axis
AxisWeightLabReadersVotesReader mean
Agent performance18%64.068.52
Reliability18%53.359.52
Scalability13%56.065.02
SEO and GEO12%64.069.02
Integrations8%54.059.02
Design output7%86.095.02
Speed7%34.839.52
Value5%74.078.52

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

n/a

0 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

59.33

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

n/a

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

Design first, and it shows: the third highest blind design score in the index, with component structure a human would not be embarrassed to inherit. Behind the interface it is thin, and the generated data layer needed manual work to survive the volume test in prompt 8. Open weights behind part of the product, which lifts the code ownership subscore.

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 24 times, partially 8 times and failed 13 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.