Bind AI logo

Full-stack app builders / rank 13 of 20 / cycle 04

Bind AI benchmark

Lets you choose the model behind the agent, which produced the widest quality range of anything in the index: the same prompt with a stronger model cleared criteria that the default model missed. We score the default configuration, which is the only fair basis for comparison, and note that the ceiling is higher than the published number.

Last run: 15 Aug 2026 09:11 UTCNext scheduled run: n/aOfficial siteBind AI reviews and ratings

Composite index

65.59

of 100 | withheld vs. cycle 03

Delta not shown for cycle 04: the roster was re-based from one merged ranking into two class boards, so cycle 03 and cycle 04 ranks are not on the same scale. Resumes cycle 05.

At a glance

Composite index

65.59

rank 13 of 20

Rank

#13

of 20 on the full-stack app builders board

Median turn latency

96.0 s per prompt

14.4 min across the full nine prompt spec, derived

Reliability

64.4%

strict pass rate

SEO score

58.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

  • Code ownership80.0
  • Value75.0
  • Design output70.0

Three weakest axes

  • SEO and GEO58.0
  • Scalability60.0
  • API and MCP62.0

Median turn latency

96.0 s per prompt

p10 53.5 s, p90 186.6 s

Strict pass rate

64.4%

29 pass, 7 partial, 9 fail

Executions recorded

45

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

USD 18 / month

Vendor's own unit and billing period. Never a currency conversion

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these 10 rows: 65.60. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand. Rounding rule: half up at two decimals, applied uniformly to all 37 published products.

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
AxisSubscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster medianScoreMedianWeight %Contribution
Agent performance69.071.51812.42
Reliability64.471.11811.59
Scalability60.066.0137.80
SEO and GEO58.063.5126.96
API and MCP62.058.095.58
Integrations68.065.085.44
Design output70.078.574.90
Turn latency score67.966.574.75
Value75.074.053.75
Code ownership80.073.032.40

Turn latency distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Bind AI, in seconds. Median wall clock time for one prompt, not for a whole build. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 38.4 smax 291.2 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 53.5 s / median 96.0 s / p90 186.6 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.94x.

Outcome split

29 pass / 7 partial / 9 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

HTML bytes, no JS

13.0 KB

13,312 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

2,240 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.070

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

58.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points on this board

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

Raw per run measurements
RunPromptPrompt targetStartedDuration (s)OutcomeNote
R01P01Tenant and user model11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC57.3failDeployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R01P02Authentication and session11 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC108.0pass
R01P03Projects CRUD with tenancy11 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC69.3pass
R01P04Public REST API with keys11 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC148.2pass
R01P05Outbound webhooks with signatures11 Aug 2026 08:14 UTC58.2partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R01P06Background jobs11 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC131.8partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R01P07Admin panel11 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC141.0failDeployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R01P08Public marketing surface11 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC44.1pass
R01P09Hardening pass11 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC151.6failAgent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes.
R02P01Tenant and user model12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC64.2pass
R02P02Authentication and session12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC75.3partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R02P03Projects CRUD with tenancy12 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC130.5pass
R02P04Public REST API with keys12 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC87.6pass
R02P05Outbound webhooks with signatures12 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC96.0pass
R02P06Background jobs12 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC185.1pass
R02P07Admin panel12 Aug 2026 08:22 UTC56.9pass
R02P08Public marketing surface12 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC116.2pass
R02P09Hardening pass12 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC98.8failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R03P01Tenant and user model13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC89.8pass
R03P02Authentication and session13 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC187.6pass
R03P03Projects CRUD with tenancy13 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC50.5failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R03P04Public REST API with keys13 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC135.5pass
R03P05Outbound webhooks with signatures13 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC65.0pass
R03P06Background jobs13 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC158.3partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R03P07Admin panel13 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC177.2pass
R03P08Public marketing surface13 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC65.5failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R03P09Hardening pass13 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC68.2pass
R04P01Tenant and user model14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC149.2pass
R04P02Authentication and session14 Aug 2026 08:04 UTC38.4pass
R04P03Projects CRUD with tenancy14 Aug 2026 08:07 UTC95.7pass
R04P04Public REST API with keys14 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC57.9failDeployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R04P05Outbound webhooks with signatures14 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC92.3partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R04P06Background jobs14 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC291.2pass
R04P07Admin panel14 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC114.3pass
R04P08Public marketing surface14 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC96.3failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R04P09Hardening pass14 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC89.0pass
R05P01Tenant and user model15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC89.4partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R05P02Authentication and session15 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC233.8pass
R05P03Projects CRUD with tenancy15 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC76.7partialDelivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria.
R05P04Public REST API with keys15 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC46.1pass
R05P05Outbound webhooks with signatures15 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC259.9pass
R05P06Background jobs15 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC154.8failGenerated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled.
R05P07Admin panel15 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC99.6pass
R05P08Public marketing surface15 Aug 2026 08:30 UTC51.3pass
R05P09Hardening pass15 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC223.7pass

Pricing

Free tier with limited model access. Paid plans from USD 18 per month with a choice of underlying models.

Entry price
USD 18 / month
Value subscore
75.0
Index points per euro
4.26

Entry price is the vendor's own published figure, fetched 21 Aug 2026, never a currency conversion. The currency label is the vendor's own except where the pricing note above records that this lab inferred it. Index points per euro is computed from a separate, euro-normalised figure used only for the Value axis: Converted at the European Central Bank euro reference rate of 1.1699 US dollars to the euro, August 21, 2026.

Capabilities as measured

stack
Choice of framework with a hosted backend
deploy
Hosted deploy
database
Managed Postgres or bring your own
auth
Built in
background jobs
Partial
webhooks
Outbound, unsigned by default
rest api
Generated with API keys
mcp server
Yes
export code
Full source export
custom domain
Yes
ssr
Mixed

Screenshot

Bind AI landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Bind AI landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Bind AI, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
SourceURLFetched
Bind AI pricing pagehttps://getbind.co/pricing14 Aug 2026
Bind AI product sitehttps://getbind.co14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness outputhttps://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json14 Aug 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.3 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Reader index

not rated yet

Lab index

65.59

No reader has scored Bind AI yet. The first 3 voters put the column on the board.

Seeded at launch

The reader scores, lab notes and open ratings published here were written by this lab in August 2026 to populate the reader column before the site had readers. They are not customer submissions, they are not vendor supplied and nobody was paid for them. Anything submitted since then comes from a registered account. The lab index is measured from logged runs and is unaffected either way.

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

n/a

0 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

65.59

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

n/a

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

Lets you choose the model behind the agent, which produced the widest quality range of anything in the index: the same prompt with a stronger model cleared criteria that the default model missed. We score the default configuration, which is the only fair basis for comparison, and note that the ceiling is higher than the published number.

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 29 times, partially 7 times and failed 9 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.