coding-agent / rank 30 of 41 / cycle 04
Trae benchmark
The cheapest paid plan in the index by a wide margin, and it is not a crippled tier: the free allowance completed most of a full run of the spec. Quality sits below the leading agents, mostly on the operational prompts, and the run to run spread is wider than the price suggests you should expect. Good value, not a leader.
Composite index
62.25
of 100 | ▲ 1 versus cycle 03
At a glance
Composite index
62.25
rank 30 of 41
Rank
#30
of 41 measured builders
Median speed
96.7 s
p10 38.2 s, p90 167.9 s
Reliability
51.1%
strict pass rate
SEO score
54.0
0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis
Three strongest axes
- Code ownership96.0
- Value88.0
- Agent performance73.0
Three weakest axes
- Speed32.5
- Reliability51.1
- SEO and GEO54.0
Median per prompt
96.7 s
p10 38.2 s, p90 167.9 s
Strict pass rate
51.1%
23 pass, 9 partial, 13 fail
Executions recorded
45
5 runs of 9 prompts
Entry price
EUR 3.00
Cheapest plan that can finish the specification
Per axis subscores
Composite recomputed from these ten rows: 62.25. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand.
| Axis | Subscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster median | Score | Median | Weight % | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 73.0 | 75.0 | 18 | 13.14 | |
| Reliability | 51.1 | 71.1 | 18 | 9.20 | |
| Scalability | 66.0 | 70.0 | 13 | 8.58 | |
| SEO and GEO | 54.0 | 58.0 | 12 | 6.48 | |
| API and MCP | 60.0 | 62.0 | 9 | 5.40 | |
| Integrations | 66.0 | 66.0 | 8 | 5.28 | |
| Design output | 66.0 | 71.0 | 7 | 4.62 | |
| Speed | 32.5 | 33.0 | 7 | 2.28 | |
| Value | 88.0 | 76.0 | 5 | 4.40 | |
| Code ownership | 96.0 | 90.0 | 3 | 2.88 |
Speed distribution
Every recorded prompt duration for Trae, in seconds. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.
Spread against the cohort
p10 38.2 s / median 96.7 s / p90 167.9 s
Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.74x.
Outcome split
23 pass / 9 partial / 13 fail
SEO and GEO measurements
Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.
HTML bytes, no JS
18.0 KB
18,432 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked
LCP
1,960 ms
Throttled connection, cold cache
CLS
0.050
Cumulative layout shift on load
SEO and GEO subscore
54.0
0 to 100, worth 12 index points
Raw run data: 45 executions
One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.
| Run | Prompt | Prompt target | Started | Duration (s) | Outcome | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R01 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 46.9 | fail | Task abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced. |
| R01 | P02 | Authentication and session | 11 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC | 73.7 | pass | |
| R01 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 11 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 204.8 | pass | |
| R01 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 11 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC | 100.8 | partial | Pagination off by one at the final page boundary. |
| R01 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 11 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC | 126.0 | pass | |
| R01 | P06 | Background jobs | 11 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC | 243.1 | pass | |
| R01 | P07 | Admin panel | 11 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 119.7 | pass | |
| R01 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 11 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC | 23.7 | pass | |
| R01 | P09 | Hardening pass | 11 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC | 37.9 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R02 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 89.0 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R02 | P02 | Authentication and session | 12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC | 73.9 | partial | Pagination off by one at the final page boundary. |
| R02 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 12 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC | 114.9 | pass | |
| R02 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 12 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC | 208.6 | pass | |
| R02 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 12 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC | 124.2 | pass | |
| R02 | P06 | Background jobs | 12 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC | 171.1 | pass | |
| R02 | P07 | Admin panel | 12 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 113.6 | fail | Deployed URL returned 500 on every request. |
| R02 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 12 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC | 36.1 | pass | |
| R02 | P09 | Hardening pass | 12 Aug 2026 08:31 UTC | 65.0 | fail | Deployed URL returned 500 on every request. |
| R03 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 34.5 | partial | Pagination off by one at the final page boundary. |
| R03 | P02 | Authentication and session | 13 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC | 58.6 | fail | Deployed URL returned 500 on every request. |
| R03 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 13 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC | 100.3 | pass | |
| R03 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 13 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC | 142.4 | pass | |
| R03 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 13 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC | 96.7 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R03 | P06 | Background jobs | 13 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC | 114.5 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R03 | P07 | Admin panel | 13 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC | 163.2 | pass | |
| R03 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 13 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 38.9 | pass | |
| R03 | P09 | Hardening pass | 13 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC | 90.0 | pass | |
| R04 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 42.6 | pass | |
| R04 | P02 | Authentication and session | 14 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC | 50.3 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R04 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 14 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC | 106.7 | fail | Agent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes. |
| R04 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 14 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC | 87.7 | fail | Agent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes. |
| R04 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 14 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC | 154.5 | partial | Validation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded. |
| R04 | P06 | Background jobs | 14 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC | 100.8 | partial | Delivered the main path, missed the boundary case named in the pass criteria. |
| R04 | P07 | Admin panel | 14 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC | 128.0 | fail | Generated migration conflicted with the existing schema and was not reconciled. |
| R04 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 14 Aug 2026 08:25 UTC | 38.6 | partial | Pagination off by one at the final page boundary. |
| R04 | P09 | Hardening pass | 14 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC | 124.9 | pass | |
| R05 | P01 | Tenant and user model | 15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC | 47.0 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R05 | P02 | Authentication and session | 15 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC | 53.5 | partial | Error envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints. |
| R05 | P03 | Projects CRUD with tenancy | 15 Aug 2026 08:05 UTC | 54.0 | pass | |
| R05 | P04 | Public REST API with keys | 15 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC | 146.3 | fail | Agent looped on the same edit for the full timeout window of 20 minutes. |
| R05 | P05 | Outbound webhooks with signatures | 15 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC | 85.9 | pass | |
| R05 | P06 | Background jobs | 15 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC | 159.0 | pass | |
| R05 | P07 | Admin panel | 15 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC | 177.6 | fail | Deployed URL returned 500 on every request. |
| R05 | P08 | Public marketing surface | 15 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC | 28.5 | pass | |
| R05 | P09 | Hardening pass | 15 Aug 2026 08:28 UTC | 43.8 | pass |
Pricing
Free tier with a real allowance rather than a token one. Paid plans from EUR 3 per month.
- Entry price
- EUR 3.00
- Value subscore
- 88.0
- Index points per euro
- 20.75
Capabilities as measured
- stack
- Your repository, any framework
- deploy
- Not included
- database
- Whatever you already run
- auth
- It wires the library you choose
- background jobs
- Implemented in your stack
- webhooks
- Written, unsigned by default
- rest api
- Written to your conventions
- mcp server
- Yes
- export code
- The code was never anywhere else
- custom domain
- Your hosting decides
- ssr
- Your framework decides
Screenshot
Trae landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Trae, captured 14 Aug 2026.
Sources and fetch dates
Every claim on this page traces to one of these.
| Source | URL | Fetched |
|---|---|---|
| Trae pricing page | https://trae.ai/pricing | 14 Aug 2026 |
| Trae product site | https://trae.ai | 14 Aug 2026 |
| LLM Tier run harness output | https://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json | 14 Aug 2026 |
Rich results carry this composite as 3.1 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.
Trae head to head
Reader index
Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.
Reader index
not rated yet
Lab index
62.25
2 readers have scored 100% of the index weight so far. A reader index is published at 3 voters and 50% coverage.
| Axis | Weight | Lab | Readers | Votes | Reader mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 18% | 73.0 | 80.5 | 2 | |
| Reliability | 18% | 51.1 | 53.5 | 2 | |
| Scalability | 13% | 66.0 | 68.0 | 1 | |
| SEO and GEO | 12% | 54.0 | 59.5 | 2 | |
| API and MCP | 9% | 60.0 | 63.0 | 2 | |
| Integrations | 8% | 66.0 | 75.5 | 2 | |
| Design output | 7% | 66.0 | 71.5 | 2 | |
| Speed | 7% | 32.5 | 37.5 | 2 | |
| Value | 5% | 88.0 | 97.0 | 2 | |
| Code ownership | 3% | 96.0 | 100.0 | 2 |
The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.
Open rating mean
n/a
0 published open ratings, submitted without an account
Lab index
62.25
Measured, not voted
Gap to the measurement
n/a
Positive means open raters put it above the measurement
What agent performance looked like in practice
The cheapest paid plan in the index by a wide margin, and it is not a crippled tier: the free allowance completed most of a full run of the spec. Quality sits below the leading agents, mostly on the operational prompts, and the run to run spread is wider than the price suggests you should expect. Good value, not a leader.
Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 23 times, partially 9 times and failed 13 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.