Zite logo

Full-stack app builders / rank 16 of 20 / cycle 04

Zite benchmark

Produces attractive interfaces quickly and holds a consistent visual language across pages. It is not built for the second half of this specification: rate limiting, signed webhooks and durable jobs were all missing or hand waved, and the exported project could not boot outside the platform.

Last run: 15 Aug 2026 09:11 UTCNext scheduled run: n/aOfficial siteZite reviews and ratings

Composite index

61.06

of 100 | withheld vs. cycle 03

Delta not shown for cycle 04: the roster was re-based from one merged ranking into two class boards, so cycle 03 and cycle 04 ranks are not on the same scale. Resumes cycle 05.

At a glance

Composite index

61.06

rank 16 of 20

Rank

#16

of 20 on the full-stack app builders board

Median turn latency

113.4 s per prompt

17.0 min across the full nine prompt spec, derived

Reliability

60.0%

strict pass rate

SEO score

60.0

0 to 100, SEO and GEO axis

Three strongest axes

  • Design output77.0
  • Value76.0
  • Agent performance68.0

Three weakest axes

  • API and MCP47.0
  • Code ownership48.0
  • Integrations55.0

Median turn latency

113.4 s per prompt

p10 60.2 s, p90 193.1 s

Strict pass rate

60.0%

27 pass, 8 partial, 10 fail

Executions recorded

45

5 runs of 9 prompts

Entry price

USD 25 / month, billed monthly

Vendor's own unit and billing period. Never a currency conversion

Per axis subscores

Composite recomputed from these 10 rows: 61.07. That is the arithmetic behind the index, and you can repeat it by hand. Rounding rule: half up at two decimals, applied uniformly to all 37 published products.

Per axis subscores against the roster median, and weighted contribution
AxisSubscore 0 to 100, tick is the roster medianScoreMedianWeight %Contribution
Agent performance68.071.51812.24
Reliability60.071.11810.80
Scalability58.066.0137.54
SEO and GEO60.063.5127.20
API and MCP47.058.094.23
Integrations55.065.084.40
Design output77.078.575.39
Turn latency score57.566.574.03
Value76.074.053.80
Code ownership48.073.031.44

Turn latency distribution

Every recorded prompt duration for Zite, in seconds. Median wall clock time for one prompt, not for a whole build. The cyan tick on the whisker is the median.

min 40.0 smax 258.7 s

Spread against the cohort

p10 60.2 s / median 113.4 s / p90 193.1 s

Scale is shared with every product in the cohort, so the bars are directly comparable between pages. Ratio of p90 to median is 1.70x.

Outcome split

27 pass / 8 partial / 10 fail

SEO and GEO measurements

Taken from the public marketing page this product generated in prompt 8, fetched with JavaScript disabled.

HTML bytes, no JS

10.0 KB

10,240 bytes of real text content with scripts blocked

LCP

2,740 ms

Throttled connection, cold cache

CLS

0.110

Cumulative layout shift on load

SEO and GEO subscore

60.0

0 to 100, worth 12 index points on this board

Raw run data: 45 executions

One row per prompt execution. Nothing is aggregated away, nothing is hidden, including the failures.

Raw per run measurements
RunPromptPrompt targetStartedDuration (s)OutcomeNote
R01P01Tenant and user model11 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC174.9partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R01P02Authentication and session11 Aug 2026 08:04 UTC66.6failDeployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R01P03Projects CRUD with tenancy11 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC62.1partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R01P04Public REST API with keys11 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC192.7partialError envelope inconsistent between two of the endpoints.
R01P05Outbound webhooks with signatures11 Aug 2026 08:16 UTC127.1pass
R01P06Background jobs11 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC127.9failNo durable queue available on the platform. Scheduled work did not survive a redeploy.
R01P07Admin panel11 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC59.1pass
R01P08Public marketing surface11 Aug 2026 08:27 UTC40.0partialRequired one clarifying instruction before the criterion was met.
R01P09Hardening pass11 Aug 2026 08:30 UTC61.8failBuild did not start after deploy. Recorded as a fail with the log preserved.
R02P01Tenant and user model12 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC96.4pass
R02P02Authentication and session12 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC74.2pass
R02P03Projects CRUD with tenancy12 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC113.9pass
R02P04Public REST API with keys12 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC75.4partialAPI keys issued but no rate limiting. The 60 request per minute ceiling was never enforced.
R02P05Outbound webhooks with signatures12 Aug 2026 08:13 UTC192.5pass
R02P06Background jobs12 Aug 2026 08:19 UTC133.2failNo durable queue available on the platform. Scheduled work did not survive a redeploy.
R02P07Admin panel12 Aug 2026 08:23 UTC68.4partialValidation added on the write path only. Read path left unguarded.
R02P08Public marketing surface12 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC86.9failDeployed URL returned 500 on every request.
R02P09Hardening pass12 Aug 2026 08:30 UTC105.6pass
R03P01Tenant and user model13 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC62.6pass
R03P02Authentication and session13 Aug 2026 08:03 UTC72.9pass
R03P03Projects CRUD with tenancy13 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC48.9pass
R03P04Public REST API with keys13 Aug 2026 08:09 UTC113.4pass
R03P05Outbound webhooks with signatures13 Aug 2026 08:12 UTC217.8partialPagination off by one at the final page boundary.
R03P06Background jobs13 Aug 2026 08:18 UTC240.3failNo durable queue available on the platform. Scheduled work did not survive a redeploy.
R03P07Admin panel13 Aug 2026 08:24 UTC146.6pass
R03P08Public marketing surface13 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC121.0failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R03P09Hardening pass13 Aug 2026 08:33 UTC219.1pass
R04P01Tenant and user model14 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC51.3pass
R04P02Authentication and session14 Aug 2026 08:02 UTC120.1pass
R04P03Projects CRUD with tenancy14 Aug 2026 08:06 UTC105.4failTask abandoned by the agent with no artifact produced.
R04P04Public REST API with keys14 Aug 2026 08:10 UTC191.0partialAPI keys issued but no rate limiting. The 60 request per minute ceiling was never enforced.
R04P05Outbound webhooks with signatures14 Aug 2026 08:15 UTC139.9pass
R04P06Background jobs14 Aug 2026 08:20 UTC258.7failNo durable queue available on the platform. Scheduled work did not survive a redeploy.
R04P07Admin panel14 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC71.4pass
R04P08Public marketing surface14 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC182.6pass
R04P09Hardening pass14 Aug 2026 08:34 UTC88.6pass
R05P01Tenant and user model15 Aug 2026 08:00 UTC161.6pass
R05P02Authentication and session15 Aug 2026 08:04 UTC137.5pass
R05P03Projects CRUD with tenancy15 Aug 2026 08:08 UTC48.5pass
R05P04Public REST API with keys15 Aug 2026 08:11 UTC193.4pass
R05P05Outbound webhooks with signatures15 Aug 2026 08:17 UTC139.4pass
R05P06Background jobs15 Aug 2026 08:21 UTC168.7failNo durable queue available on the platform. Scheduled work did not survive a redeploy.
R05P07Admin panel15 Aug 2026 08:26 UTC71.8pass
R05P08Public marketing surface15 Aug 2026 08:29 UTC61.8pass
R05P09Hardening pass15 Aug 2026 08:32 UTC62.8pass

Pricing

Free tier with limited credits and one workspace. Paid plans from USD 25 per month.

Entry price
USD 25 / month, billed monthly
Value subscore
76.0
Index points per euro
2.86

Entry price is the vendor's own published figure, fetched 08 Sep 2026, never a currency conversion. The currency label is the vendor's own except where the pricing note above records that this lab inferred it. Index points per euro is computed from a separate, euro-normalised figure used only for the Value axis: Converted at the European Central Bank euro reference rate of 1.1699 US dollars to the euro, August 21, 2026.

Capabilities as measured

stack
Platform runtime with a React front end
deploy
Hosted only
database
Built in collections
auth
Built in
background jobs
No durable queue
webhooks
Outbound only
rest api
Limited
mcp server
Yes, vendor hosted at mcp.zite.com over streamable HTTP with OAuth, 17 build tools plus data tools
export code
No clean self host path
custom domain
Yes on paid plans
ssr
Client rendered

Screenshot

Zite landing page, captured by the lab on 14 Aug 2026 at 1440 by 900. Stored locally, never hotlinked.

Zite landing page, captured by the lab at 1440 by 900

Zite, captured 14 Aug 2026.

Sources and fetch dates

Every claim on this page traces to one of these.

Sources with fetch dates
SourceURLFetched
Zite pricing pagehttps://zite.com/pricing14 Aug 2026
Zite product sitehttps://zite.com14 Aug 2026
LLM Tier run harness outputhttps://www.llm-tier.com/api/runs.json14 Aug 2026
Zite developer docs, Connect the Zite MCPhttps://developers.zite.com/mcp/connect04 Sep 2026

Rich results carry this composite as 3.1 on a 0 to 5 scale because that is the only scale the format accepts. The number on this page, 0 to 100, is the real one.

Zite head to head

Reader index

Voted by readers with an account, one score per person per axis. Published beside the lab index, never inside it.

Reader index

not rated yet

Lab index

61.06

1 readers have scored 100% of the index weight so far. A reader index is published at 3 voters and 50% coverage.

Seeded at launch

The reader scores, lab notes and open ratings published here were written by this lab in August 2026 to populate the reader column before the site had readers. They are not customer submissions, they are not vendor supplied and nobody was paid for them. Anything submitted since then comes from a registered account. The lab index is measured from logged runs and is unaffected either way.

Reader mean against the measured lab subscore for each axis
AxisWeightLabReadersVotesReader mean
Agent performance18%68.060.01
Reliability18%60.049.01
Scalability13%58.045.01
SEO and GEO12%60.054.01
API and MCP9%47.045.01
Integrations8%55.040.01
Design output7%77.074.01
Turn latency score7%57.517.01
Value5%76.066.01
Code ownership3%48.034.01

The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.

Open rating mean

65.00

2 published open ratings, submitted without an account

Lab index

61.06

Measured, not voted

Gap to the measurement

3.94

Positive means open raters put it above the measurement

What agent performance looked like in practice

Produces attractive interfaces quickly and holds a consistent visual language across pages. It is not built for the second half of this specification: rate limiting, signed webhooks and durable jobs were all missing or hand waved, and the exported project could not boot outside the platform.

Across 45 recorded executions this product met the published pass criterion cleanly 27 times, partially 8 times and failed 10 times. The rows above carry the reviewer note for every non clean outcome, which is the only way to tell a product that fails loudly from one that fails quietly.