Opinion page / measured product / rank 11
Zed Reviews and Ratings (2026)
Reader ratings for Zed, aggregated on the same 0 to 100 scale we use for the lab index, with our own commentary underneath. If you are looking for Zed opiniones, reviews or a rating you can check, the measurements behind every claim are on the Zed benchmark page.
Reader index
79.79
3 voters, 28 axis scores. Never blended into the lab index.
Lab index
72.17
Measured on the vibeOps spec
Strict pass rate
71.1%
32 clean and 8 failed executions
Median per prompt
31.4 s
p90 54.5 s
Reader index
One score per reader per axis on a 0 to 100 scale, editable at any time.
Reader index
79.79
Lab index
72.17
3 readers, 28 axis scores, last change 12 Aug 2026. Readers rate Zed 7.6 points above the measurement.
| Axis | Weight | Lab | Readers | Votes | Reader mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 18% | 77.0 | 86.7 | 3 | |
| Reliability | 18% | 71.1 | 81.3 | 3 | |
| Scalability | 13% | 70.0 | 78.0 | 2 | |
| SEO and GEO | 12% | 55.0 | 58.0 | 2 | |
| API and MCP | 9% | 66.0 | 77.7 | 3 | |
| Integrations | 8% | 64.0 | 69.7 | 3 | |
| Design output | 7% | 64.0 | 73.7 | 3 | |
| Speed | 7% | 100.0 | 100.0 | 3 | |
| Value | 5% | 86.0 | 94.7 | 3 | |
| Code ownership | 3% | 99.0 | 100.0 | 3 |
The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.
Score Zed
Your scores feed the reader column only. Submitting an axis again edits your existing score rather than adding a second vote.
Reader scores need an account so one person cannot vote twice. Create a reader account or sign in.
Reader scores are published in a separate reader index column. They never move the measured lab index.
Reader lab notes on Zed
Written by readers with an account. Sorted by upvotes, then by date.
Fastest loop I have measured, and I timed it properly
Lydia Mwangi | 09 Aug 2026
I sat with a stopwatch across nine prompts because I did not believe the published median. It held up: the wait between asking and having a reviewable diff was consistently under a minute for the small prompts. What the number does not tell you is why. It is not that the model is faster, it is that nothing else in the loop is slow. The diff renders instantly, the editor does not stall while the agent works, and accepting a change does not trigger a reindex you have to wait through. Correctness is mid table, so my honest read is that you get more attempts per hour rather than better attempts.
Catarina Ferreira | 10 Aug 2026
Same conclusion from the free side. Bring your own key and the licence cost is zero, so more attempts per hour is close to more attempts per euro.
Write a lab note
What you built, what broke, what you measured. Short opinions belong in the open rating form further down.
Open rating distribution
Open ratings submitted without an account. Neither the lab index nor the reader index is part of this average.
| Band | Share | Ratings |
|---|---|---|
| 90 to 100 | 0 | |
| 80 to 89 | 0 | |
| 70 to 79 | 0 | |
| 60 to 69 | 0 | |
| 0 to 59 | 0 |
Lab commentary
Our reading of the numbers, kept separate from the reader ratings.
The fastest median in the index, and the reason is architectural rather than clever prompting: the editor is fast, the diff review is instant and almost no time is lost to interface latency. Correctness sits in the middle of the agent group, so the right read is that it costs the least time per attempt rather than that it is the best at any single attempt.
On the measured axes, Zed is strongest at speed with a subscore of 100.0 and weakest at seo and geo at 55.0. Because seo and geo carries 12 of the 100 index points, that weakness costs it roughly 5.40 points against a perfect result on that axis alone.
Reader ratings and lab measurements answer different questions. A reader rating carries the thing a harness cannot capture: whether the product was pleasant to work with over weeks, how support behaved, whether the bill matched the plan. The lab index carries the thing an opinion cannot: 45 timed executions of the same specification with the failures counted. Read them side by side and treat a large gap between the two as the interesting signal.
0 open ratings
Newest first, no account needed. Moderated for spam and vendor astroturfing, not for sentiment.
No reader ratings published yet. Yours would be the first.
Add an open rating
No account needed. For a score that counts toward the reader index, use the axis form above.