Opinion page / measured product / rank 12
Qodo Reviews and Ratings (2026)
Reader ratings for Qodo, aggregated on the same 0 to 100 scale we use for the lab index, with our own commentary underneath. If you are looking for Qodo opiniones, reviews or a rating you can check, the measurements behind every claim are on the Qodo benchmark page.
Reader index
not rated yet
2 voters, 19 axis scores. Never blended into the lab index.
Lab index
66.06
Measured on the vibeOps spec
Strict pass rate
77.8%
35 clean and 4 failed executions
Median turn latency
99.3 s per prompt
p90 189.8 s
Reader index
One score per reader per axis on a 0 to 100 scale, editable at any time.
Reader index
not rated yet
Lab index
66.06
2 readers have scored 100% of the index weight so far. A reader index is published at 3 voters and 50% coverage.
Seeded at launch
The reader scores, lab notes and open ratings published here were written by this lab in August 2026 to populate the reader column before the site had readers. They are not customer submissions, they are not vendor supplied and nobody was paid for them. Anything submitted since then comes from a registered account. The lab index is measured from logged runs and is unaffected either way.
| Axis | Weight | Lab | Readers | Votes | Reader mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent performance | 18.55% | 70.0 | 61.5 | 2 | |
| Reliability | 18.56% | 77.8 | 83.0 | 2 | |
| Scalability | 13.4% | 76.0 | 70.5 | 2 | |
| SEO and GEO | 12.37% | 52.0 | 46.5 | 2 | |
| API and MCP | 9.28% | 68.0 | 60.5 | 2 | |
| Integrations | 8.25% | 70.0 | 65.5 | 2 | |
| Design output | 7.22% | 56.0 | 52.0 | 1 | |
| Turn latency score | 7.22% | 31.6 | 26.0 | 2 | |
| Value | 5.15% | 70.0 | 70.5 | 2 |
The reader index is a weighted mean of reader submitted axis scores using the published index weights, renormalised over the axes readers have scored. It is never blended into the lab index. How this works.
Score Qodo
Your scores feed the reader column only. Submitting an axis again edits your existing score rather than adding a second vote.
Reader scores need an account so one person cannot vote twice. Create a reader account or sign in.
Reader scores are published in a separate reader index column. They never move the measured lab index.
Reader lab notes on Qodo
Written by readers with an account. Sorted by upvotes, then by date.
No reader lab notes yet. A note has to describe something you actually built, so the first one here is worth reading.
Write a lab note
What you built, what broke, what you measured. Short opinions belong in the open rating form further down.
Open rating distribution
Open ratings submitted without an account. Neither the lab index nor the reader index is part of this average.
| Band | Share | Ratings |
|---|---|---|
| 90 to 100 | 0 | |
| 80 to 89 | 0 | |
| 70 to 79 | 0 | |
| 60 to 69 | 0 | |
| 0 to 59 | 0 |
Lab commentary
Our reading of the numbers, kept separate from the reader ratings.
Optimised for tests and review rather than for building from nothing, and it is the wrong shape for a spec that starts with an empty directory. It still finished, and the test suites it wrote were the most thorough in the index: the volume test in prompt 8 was the only place any product wrote a load test without being asked. Read the low agent score as a mismatch with this spec rather than a weak tool.
On the measured axes, Qodo is strongest at reliability with a subscore of 77.8 and weakest at turn latency score at 31.6. Because turn latency score carries 7.22 of the 100 index points, that weakness costs it roughly 4.94 points against a perfect result on that axis alone.
Reader ratings and lab measurements answer different questions. A reader rating carries the thing a harness cannot capture: whether the product was pleasant to work with over weeks, how support behaved, whether the bill matched the plan. The lab index carries the thing an opinion cannot: 45 timed executions of the same specification with the failures counted. Read them side by side and treat a large gap between the two as the interesting signal.
0 open ratings
Newest first, no account needed. Moderated for spam and vendor astroturfing, not for sentiment.
No reader ratings published yet. Yours would be the first.
Add an open rating
No account needed. For a score that counts toward the reader index, use the axis form above.